Active Users:542 Time:13/12/2025 08:22:55 AM
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation Cannoli Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
It was the actions of the government that gave Japan a reason to attack us. Classical liberal or libertarians would not have incited Japan by freezing their assets or interfering with their commerce. Pearl Harbor was not a bolt from the blue, and when you get right down to it, how did it threaten the actual country? Destroying a bunch of obsolete ships is a long way from invading or actually harming the country itself. As far as the US government went, it was thanks to the awesome power and efficacy of big government that we had Japanese losing their property and being interned in concentration camps, a country filled with Stalinesque propaganda urging citizens to sacrifice for their government, spy on the neighbors, produce greater quantities and be good sheep, and an arrogant, uninformed dilettante stepping all over the cranks of the adults who were trying to fight a war responsibly, and sabotaging the end results of our theoretical war aims (we end tyranny and dictatorship in Europe by liberating the countries that CHOSE dictators, and turning the rest over to a tyrannical dictator who seems nice to said arrogant dilettante?!? ). Yay government!
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 938 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 668 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 635 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 703 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 269 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 272 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 675 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 521 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 556 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 579 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 603 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 645 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 572 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 550 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 694 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 517 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 597 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 551 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 546 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 651 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 683 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 638 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 656 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 647 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 644 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 672 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 680 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 628 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 702 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 767 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 772 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 549 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 637 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 529 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 536 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 584 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 618 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 520 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 567 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 705 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 534 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 556 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 685 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 722 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1104 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 530 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 538 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 477 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 525 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 431 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 622 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 530 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 724 Views

Reply to Message