Active Users:1514 Time:19/10/2025 10:46:42 PM
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation Cannoli Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
It was the actions of the government that gave Japan a reason to attack us. Classical liberal or libertarians would not have incited Japan by freezing their assets or interfering with their commerce. Pearl Harbor was not a bolt from the blue, and when you get right down to it, how did it threaten the actual country? Destroying a bunch of obsolete ships is a long way from invading or actually harming the country itself. As far as the US government went, it was thanks to the awesome power and efficacy of big government that we had Japanese losing their property and being interned in concentration camps, a country filled with Stalinesque propaganda urging citizens to sacrifice for their government, spy on the neighbors, produce greater quantities and be good sheep, and an arrogant, uninformed dilettante stepping all over the cranks of the adults who were trying to fight a war responsibly, and sabotaging the end results of our theoretical war aims (we end tyranny and dictatorship in Europe by liberating the countries that CHOSE dictators, and turning the rest over to a tyrannical dictator who seems nice to said arrogant dilettante?!? ). Yay government!
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 910 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 649 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 605 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 680 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 248 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 261 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 639 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 489 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 521 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 548 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 581 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 609 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 542 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 521 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 661 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 478 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 552 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 526 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 514 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 638 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 657 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 604 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 636 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 618 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 610 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 639 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 661 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 594 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 658 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 743 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 743 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 531 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 599 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 501 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 513 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 548 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 582 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 479 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 537 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 681 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 498 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 525 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 646 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 702 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1061 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 502 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 516 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 445 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 491 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 413 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 577 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 517 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 688 Views

Reply to Message