Active Users:556 Time:18/03/2026 07:39:43 PM
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) Joel Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
I don't know if all of their content is free but they offer a great deal of free content.

They do at least claim to be unbiased, however laughable I consider that claim (particularly when the guy covering the FL election in 2000, the first to call it for Bush, was one of Bushs cousins; it's remarkable how many people who said on election night that Bush won happened to be related to or employed by him. ) I don't think Stewart has ever made such a claim in earnest, though I admit I RARELY see much of his stuff since I won't pay for TV (in fact, I think I've overheard Rushs show at the quickie mart far more recently) and Rush spends too much time bashing "liberal" this and "liberal" that for any such claim to be taken seriously.

When I watch politics on TV (which is seldom these days since I'm so disgusted with all of them) it's usually the News Hour and Washington Week, but then I seem to recall the last administration thought PBS was biased (probably because it was the first news outlet under their management that didn't do as told) so I guess no one's perfect. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 981 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 716 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 680 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 751 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 295 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 289 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 718 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 565 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 609 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 613 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 635 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 690 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 613 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 589 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 736 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 559 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 649 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 596 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 589 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 692 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 743 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 683 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 698 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 695 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 702 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 720 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 718 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 678 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 743 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 806 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 813 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 582 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 675 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 569 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 590 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 627 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 662 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 555 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 627 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 760 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 577 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 607 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 728 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 755 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1157 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 569 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 582 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 528 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 563 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 466 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 663 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 579 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 795 Views

Reply to Message