Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
Joel Send a noteboard - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
It wasn't until Newt drug him kicking and screaming to center and the internet bubble gave a temporary bump to his economy that he had wide spread support.
I guess you could say in a round about way that health care reform made him popular because pushing it was what gave him a republican congress and forced him back to the middle.
I guess you could say in a round about way that health care reform made him popular because pushing it was what gave him a republican congress and forced him back to the middle.
There was a SLEW of would be Democratic nominees; pushing healthcare is what set Clinton apart from the pack. Unlike this past election, when even MCCAIN tried to muscle in on the act, no one else was beating that drum. So, OK, yeah, maybe it wasn't We Love the President Day all the time, but that was THE Clinton issue, and he did get the most votes, which means that was the most popular of the three options. And while I do think Perot was part of what got him elected, it's not a given; PEROTS big issue was the "giant sucking sound" and back then union members and other Dems were naive enough to think that was strictly a Republican (i.e. Bush) initiative. Maybe we should've voted for Gephardt (or Gregory Peck....
)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view
- 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM
938 Views
And a personal comment
- 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM
668 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though?
- 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
703 Views
? *NM*
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding
- 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM
521 Views
Even so.
- 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM
556 Views
Like the NYT?
- 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM
579 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias.
- 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM
603 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters
- 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM
645 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. )
- 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
572 Views
PBS is biased
- 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM
550 Views
You're entitled to believe that.
- 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM
694 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
- 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
517 Views
Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
- 09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
644 Views
so they wouldn't be biased becuas it could hurt them but you still argue republicans attack them
- 09/02/2010 02:19:53 PM
593 Views
We have been for some time.
- 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM
597 Views
I don't think that's the case
- 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM
551 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform.
- 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM
546 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare
- 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM
651 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM
683 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM
638 Views
[insert witty subject line here]
- 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM
656 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here
- 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM
647 Views
'K
- 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM
644 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode'
- 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM
672 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?"
- 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM
680 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none
- 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM
628 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning.
- 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM
702 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot
- 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM
549 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
- 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
637 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries
- 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM
529 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't.
- 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM
536 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it
- 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM
584 Views
Whom do you prefer?
- 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM
618 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though
- 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM
520 Views
In other words you prefer the system we have; thanks for admitting it. 
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
573 Views
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
573 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship
- 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM
567 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!"
- 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM
705 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel
- 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM
534 Views
Don't speak in absolutes and I won't read absolutes.
- 04/02/2010 10:08:43 AM
543 Views
Some qualifiers can be left unsaid for a clearer message. Or better delivery
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
545 Views
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
545 Views
Qualifiers are clarifying by nature.
- 04/02/2010 10:49:06 AM
664 Views
huh. That does make sense. I know malpractice is a big weight on the the system in the US.
- 04/02/2010 11:58:37 AM
513 Views
Perhaps, but it's hardly the greatest weight, or even in the top three, IMHO.
- 05/02/2010 05:44:49 AM
648 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
- 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
555 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you!
- 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
722 Views
I do generally agree, but I think the Washington Naval Conference is too often overlooked.
- 06/02/2010 02:33:51 AM
700 Views
Politicians and pundits should stop calling things that happened in the last decade "unprecedented"
- 02/02/2010 03:23:27 AM
767 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems
- 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM
529 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress?
- 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM
538 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on
- 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM
477 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist?
- 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM
525 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want
- 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM
431 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills.
- 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
622 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans
- 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM
530 Views
So we've gone from "stop being secretive" to "no public meetings" eh?
- 09/02/2010 11:59:50 AM
565 Views
well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
- 09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
535 Views
Was it? I don't recall any Dem complaining about private meeting on healthcare.
- 10/02/2010 09:44:56 AM
694 Views
most liberals seem to foretting the "rhetoric" that Obama used to get elected
- 13/02/2010 06:54:34 AM
524 Views
