Active Users:439 Time:07/04/2026 08:42:27 PM
Re: Heh Macharius Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM
My hope is that now that something is in place that some people sit down and really try to tackle the whole cost control issue.


Cost control is easy:

1. Eliminate the fee-for-service model that only encourages bloat and inefficiency.

2. Force hospitals and clinics to advertise/make public the costs of treatment, so patients can make an informed decision (the billing department knows what everything costs, why can't we?). Also, doctors should provide a choice to patients where possible.

I specifically make that last sentence because my fiancee was told to show up for surgery a week before she was ready; resulting in unnecessary usage of pre/post-op space and staff not to mention the OR itself. Waiting a week would have saved work, time, drugs, and most importantly prevented a lot of pain on her part... not to mention leaving us with $3000 less in bills). Oh, and a day of paid vacation time on my part to be with her in the hospital during all this. The surgeon even mentioned that some other doctors told patients to just come back in two weeks, why was he trying to rush her in after only three days?!

3. Make it so that insurance companies actually have to compete amongst each other(health care coverage is the least competitive industry in the economy). I think I saw Tom post a more thorough explanation of this several weeks ago.

4. Something about malpractice suits.

I'm sure a few/some/many/most would disagree with that, but that's how I see things. ;)
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1470 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 806 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 827 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 913 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 762 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 784 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 717 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 836 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 888 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 821 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 851 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 957 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 772 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 760 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 901 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 389 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 369 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 820 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 1079 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 838 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 444 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 380 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1262 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 931 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 776 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 768 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 876 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 404 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 345 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 779 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 789 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 972 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 783 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 796 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 801 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 893 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 981 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 870 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 805 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 772 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 778 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 811 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 731 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 905 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 929 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 805 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 770 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 876 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 757 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 738 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 830 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 770 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 837 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 331 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 869 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 892 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 806 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 790 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 896 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 716 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 729 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 947 Views

Reply to Message