Active Users:597 Time:16/02/2026 04:36:33 PM
Re: Heh Macharius Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM
My hope is that now that something is in place that some people sit down and really try to tackle the whole cost control issue.


Cost control is easy:

1. Eliminate the fee-for-service model that only encourages bloat and inefficiency.

2. Force hospitals and clinics to advertise/make public the costs of treatment, so patients can make an informed decision (the billing department knows what everything costs, why can't we?). Also, doctors should provide a choice to patients where possible.

I specifically make that last sentence because my fiancee was told to show up for surgery a week before she was ready; resulting in unnecessary usage of pre/post-op space and staff not to mention the OR itself. Waiting a week would have saved work, time, drugs, and most importantly prevented a lot of pain on her part... not to mention leaving us with $3000 less in bills). Oh, and a day of paid vacation time on my part to be with her in the hospital during all this. The surgeon even mentioned that some other doctors told patients to just come back in two weeks, why was he trying to rush her in after only three days?!

3. Make it so that insurance companies actually have to compete amongst each other(health care coverage is the least competitive industry in the economy). I think I saw Tom post a more thorough explanation of this several weeks ago.

4. Something about malpractice suits.

I'm sure a few/some/many/most would disagree with that, but that's how I see things. ;)
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1448 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 787 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 807 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 897 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 739 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 766 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 692 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 816 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 867 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 791 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 824 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 932 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 753 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 739 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 882 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 382 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 363 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 796 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 1059 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 819 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 438 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 372 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1241 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 914 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 751 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 742 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 858 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 397 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 337 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 759 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 771 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 954 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 767 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 776 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 786 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 872 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 965 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 850 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 788 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 752 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 754 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 794 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 704 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 887 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 907 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 781 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 754 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 860 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 738 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 716 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 812 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 753 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 817 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 328 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 849 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 872 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 783 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 773 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 878 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 699 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 710 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 920 Views

Reply to Message