Active Users:390 Time:01/05/2025 07:41:19 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I thought I had allowed for what you said. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 04:33:30 PM
You come the closest only when you're talking about someone playing something along the lines of 'true' neutral. 'Lawful' neutral and 'chaotic' neutral are completely different animals all together.


Wouldn't those be included, like the Druid example, in the category of alignments that are not focused on the general definitions of good and evil. Someone who is Lawful Neutral or Chaotic Neutral is not actually taking a position on the good/evil scale, they're just ignoring it in the pursuit of their own moral imperatives, in your example, the order/chaos axis.

Your definition also does not mesh with any sort of depth to any decision. While a person might, on a metascale, prefer the status quo, decision by decision, in the heat of a moment, or even in planning for future events, decisions get made that could never be, as you are actually describing them, truly passive. A person could have a neutral outlook on life, but has a role/profession/situation that demands or rewards action and clear decisions. Such a person is not always tied down by ideas of good or only self-serving personal interest.


Yeah, but in this case he's not so much pursuing a neutral alignment as avoiding taking a stand on a good/evil alignment, it's that whole avoidance/status quo motif I mentioned previously. As you say it, in your example the neutral character's role/profession/situation force him into a decision, which is a reactive outlook. I did not mean that a neutral character could not take active action or even change the world in one way or another, I simply meant that a neutral character - if his alignment is defined by his position on the good/evil axis and not by some alternative code - would have no desire to.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
My companions! Lend me thine vast expertise Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 03:56:19 PM 1035 Views
Hm. It depends on what you mean by "rewarded." beetnemesis - 20/09/2011 04:15:18 PM 744 Views
No, not quite Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 04:29:42 PM 673 Views
I don't think I know anything that matches what you want. Nate - 20/09/2011 04:39:22 PM 643 Views
You are a horrible human being. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 20/09/2011 08:24:05 PM 277 Views
I'm morally grey! Women love me, and men want to be like me. *NM* Nate - 20/09/2011 09:15:31 PM 309 Views
Kel - 28/09/2011 12:58:11 AM 670 Views
I thnk Fallout 3 gave you bonuses for being neutral. MightyYT - 20/09/2011 04:52:11 PM 629 Views
That was the first that came to my mind, too. *NM* ironclad - 21/09/2011 09:46:11 AM 271 Views
P.S. re: "thine" Nate - 20/09/2011 04:57:27 PM 583 Views
Damn, I knew it! Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 05:11:25 PM 645 Views
"Netural" isn't about picking "good and evil" choices. LadyLorraine - 20/09/2011 04:59:42 PM 633 Views
It'd be pretty difficult to specifically reward you for being a 'gray' character. (Two games) Jacob - 20/09/2011 05:02:28 PM 773 Views
Take Knights of the Old Republic, for example Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 05:08:04 PM 691 Views
That's not so much an alignment as just metagaming the system. Fanatic-Templar - 20/09/2011 09:27:49 PM 641 Views
thank you for phrasing that better than me *NM* LadyLorraine - 20/09/2011 11:11:54 PM 280 Views
Maybe I didn't explain right Dark Knight - 20/09/2011 11:19:51 PM 589 Views
I'd say that's evil. Fanatic-Templar - 21/09/2011 03:00:32 AM 754 Views
of course, then you get into question of whether actions like that example are evil LadyLorraine - 21/09/2011 04:03:03 AM 636 Views
Questions of morality are the great fun of philosophy . Fanatic-Templar - 21/09/2011 05:24:50 AM 596 Views
Re: I'd say that's evil. Dark Knight - 21/09/2011 06:23:11 PM 739 Views
Re: I'd say that's evil. Fanatic-Templar - 21/09/2011 10:21:17 PM 747 Views
That's actually a pretty narrow view of Neutral when it comes to Alignment or Morality. Jacob - 21/09/2011 02:19:34 PM 633 Views
I thought I had allowed for what you said. Fanatic-Templar - 21/09/2011 04:33:30 PM 570 Views
It's not a neutral outlook Dark Knight - 21/09/2011 06:27:27 PM 695 Views
See, what you're talking about IS in fact considered EVIL. Jacob - 21/09/2011 08:33:30 PM 627 Views
You might want to try The Witcher series. Zalis - 21/09/2011 05:16:05 AM 611 Views
I just played the first one... LadyLorraine - 21/09/2011 02:14:13 PM 668 Views
Grey decisions are good but... Dark Knight - 21/09/2011 06:19:04 PM 711 Views
they don't reward it because, for the most part, they don't want you taking a middle ground. LadyLorraine - 21/09/2011 07:10:48 PM 593 Views
Well that's just stupid. Tired of picking the 2 sides over and over *NM* Dark Knight - 21/09/2011 08:02:11 PM 314 Views
Neutrality is often boring or selfish. Good stories seldom have truly neutral protagonists. *NM* Zalis - 22/09/2011 06:27:05 PM 296 Views
Are you kidding? Dark Knight - 22/09/2011 06:54:19 PM 665 Views
There's a difference between doing "bad" things for a good purpose, and being neutral. *NM* lord-of-shadow - 22/09/2011 09:12:16 PM 264 Views
That's chaotic good, not neutral. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/09/2011 10:36:28 PM 305 Views
I have an on-topic comment as well as a general rant on game morality systems. Aemon - 21/09/2011 06:43:21 PM 794 Views
if they wanted to make the conversation mechanics more complicated... LadyLorraine - 21/09/2011 07:14:21 PM 709 Views
I don't care if it's complicated so long as it's clear. Aemon - 22/09/2011 08:27:46 PM 597 Views
I agree with this, actually. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 22/09/2011 09:17:23 PM 306 Views
I agree with that, too. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/09/2011 10:38:15 PM 291 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes