Active Users:309 Time:03/05/2024 02:04:19 PM
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM

The entire investigation is political theater. What I seer is a lot of arguments that boom down to people's feelings about Trump being used as rationalization for suspicion. With Benghazi we had a dead ambassador and an administration clearly lying. Here we have some leaked emails and media manning smoke machines and cry where there is smoke there must be fire.

Reply to message
Comey was fired today.. - 10/05/2017 05:41:17 AM 1027 Views
The firing as such is one thing, but the timing raises major question marks. - 10/05/2017 07:29:57 AM 404 Views
What question marks? I know that is the talking point but they stop there - 10/05/2017 05:24:59 PM 301 Views
It doesn't necessarily have to be about Trump personally. - 10/05/2017 08:13:12 PM 442 Views
There is zero evidence that Flynn colluded with the Russians on the campaign - 10/05/2017 09:36:20 PM 311 Views
Aren't you confusing several things? - 11/05/2017 07:16:21 PM 278 Views
Agreed on all points. *NM* - 11/05/2017 04:26:32 PM 206 Views
I read he found out by seeing it on the news. - 10/05/2017 08:42:28 AM 439 Views
I heard he found out because he's one of Trump's twitter followers *NM* - 10/05/2017 01:58:10 PM 185 Views
I've seen it now. - 10/05/2017 10:11:59 PM 298 Views
I read that too - 10/05/2017 02:18:29 PM 440 Views
He was speaking on the west coast, at a FBI event - 11/05/2017 04:48:32 AM 308 Views
Mitch McConnell isn't worried, so I'm sure it's fine. *NM* - 10/05/2017 03:53:58 PM 219 Views
Sarcasm aside, have you seen even a shred of evidence that it was improper? - 10/05/2017 04:01:46 PM 359 Views
Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is? - 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM 336 Views
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved? - 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM 385 Views
No I can't argue against a negative - 11/05/2017 04:45:18 AM 311 Views
I'm only surprised it didn't happen earlier - 10/05/2017 03:56:10 PM 330 Views
Doesn't that feel like The Point? - 10/05/2017 06:39:00 PM 343 Views
How can Trump prove a negative, though? - 14/05/2017 09:52:47 PM 376 Views
Indeed it does. And a lot of people rather doubt Trump would nominate someone like that. - 10/05/2017 08:00:53 PM 422 Views
That op-ed was a complete waste of time to read - 11/05/2017 07:21:15 PM 274 Views
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. - 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM 340 Views
I think you're full of shit, too. - 12/05/2017 06:25:59 AM 270 Views
The funny thing with Trump is... - 17/05/2017 06:13:54 PM 449 Views
Sorry that wss nothing but partisan babble *NM* - 12/05/2017 02:30:36 AM 248 Views
You'd think some of the HRC diehard types would be cheering. *NM* - 10/05/2017 10:24:28 PM 208 Views
I'm sick to death of all this shit. - 11/05/2017 05:10:26 PM 291 Views
Yes. - 12/05/2017 10:19:19 AM 234 Views
pics or it didn't happen *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:08:18 PM 210 Views
Mookie do not be sick, and do not call upon the spectre of death onto yourself - 12/05/2017 03:30:06 PM 258 Views
I will never reach senility - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 372 Views
damned double post - ironic considering the subject line *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 192 Views
Says the guy who doubles post - 12/05/2017 04:13:16 PM 279 Views
I'll take door number two, thank you very much. *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:20:54 PM 184 Views
Mookie your Yodaish is still a work in progress - 12/05/2017 04:33:07 PM 290 Views

Reply to Message