Active Users:347 Time:03/05/2024 06:55:32 AM
Agreed on all points. *NM* The Shrike Send a noteboard - 11/05/2017 04:26:32 PM

View original post
It's pretty common sense as you say in the sense that Comey had lost a lot of credit with the political establishment on both sides, and if he can be replaced by someone equally or more competent but less tainted, that would be good.

On the other hand, given Trump's track record so far, one can't exactly have much faith in his ability and inclination to nominate someone like that - the suspicion is strong that he's doing this at least in part to sabotage the Russia investigations by trying to put some ally in Comey's place who can make it all go away. And even if Comey's replacement is in fact a good pick, still the timing of his firing can't exactly be helpful for those investigations.


Reply to message
Comey was fired today.. - 10/05/2017 05:41:17 AM 1025 Views
The firing as such is one thing, but the timing raises major question marks. - 10/05/2017 07:29:57 AM 403 Views
What question marks? I know that is the talking point but they stop there - 10/05/2017 05:24:59 PM 300 Views
It doesn't necessarily have to be about Trump personally. - 10/05/2017 08:13:12 PM 442 Views
There is zero evidence that Flynn colluded with the Russians on the campaign - 10/05/2017 09:36:20 PM 311 Views
Aren't you confusing several things? - 11/05/2017 07:16:21 PM 278 Views
Agreed on all points. *NM* - 11/05/2017 04:26:32 PM 206 Views
I read he found out by seeing it on the news. - 10/05/2017 08:42:28 AM 438 Views
I heard he found out because he's one of Trump's twitter followers *NM* - 10/05/2017 01:58:10 PM 185 Views
I've seen it now. - 10/05/2017 10:11:59 PM 297 Views
I read that too - 10/05/2017 02:18:29 PM 439 Views
He was speaking on the west coast, at a FBI event - 11/05/2017 04:48:32 AM 307 Views
Mitch McConnell isn't worried, so I'm sure it's fine. *NM* - 10/05/2017 03:53:58 PM 219 Views
Sarcasm aside, have you seen even a shred of evidence that it was improper? - 10/05/2017 04:01:46 PM 359 Views
Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is? - 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM 335 Views
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved? - 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM 384 Views
No I can't argue against a negative - 11/05/2017 04:45:18 AM 310 Views
I'm only surprised it didn't happen earlier - 10/05/2017 03:56:10 PM 329 Views
Doesn't that feel like The Point? - 10/05/2017 06:39:00 PM 342 Views
How can Trump prove a negative, though? - 14/05/2017 09:52:47 PM 376 Views
Indeed it does. And a lot of people rather doubt Trump would nominate someone like that. - 10/05/2017 08:00:53 PM 422 Views
That op-ed was a complete waste of time to read - 11/05/2017 07:21:15 PM 274 Views
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. - 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM 339 Views
I think you're full of shit, too. - 12/05/2017 06:25:59 AM 269 Views
The funny thing with Trump is... - 17/05/2017 06:13:54 PM 448 Views
Sorry that wss nothing but partisan babble *NM* - 12/05/2017 02:30:36 AM 248 Views
You'd think some of the HRC diehard types would be cheering. *NM* - 10/05/2017 10:24:28 PM 208 Views
I'm sick to death of all this shit. - 11/05/2017 05:10:26 PM 290 Views
Yes. - 12/05/2017 10:19:19 AM 233 Views
pics or it didn't happen *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:08:18 PM 209 Views
Mookie do not be sick, and do not call upon the spectre of death onto yourself - 12/05/2017 03:30:06 PM 257 Views
I will never reach senility - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 371 Views
damned double post - ironic considering the subject line *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 191 Views
Says the guy who doubles post - 12/05/2017 04:13:16 PM 279 Views
I'll take door number two, thank you very much. *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:20:54 PM 184 Views
Mookie your Yodaish is still a work in progress - 12/05/2017 04:33:07 PM 290 Views

Reply to Message