Active Users:325 Time:03/05/2024 03:35:09 PM
Let's just take that one extra step Tom Send a noteboard - 11/05/2017 02:51:49 PM

No intelligence agency has accused Trump or his team of doing anything improper, either. They have said that they believe with a high degree of certainty that Russia was the source of the "hacking" of Hillary Clinton's campaign and the CIA and FBI, but not NSA, also believe with a high degree of certainty (NSA isn't as certain), that it was to influence the election because they believed Trump would be better for Russia than Hillary. Of course, that last part is a no-brainer considering that one candidate, Trump, was saying, "Wouldn't it be nice if we had better relations with Russia?" and the other candidate was attempting to show some sort of "resolve" by being wildly anti-Russia.

Of course, this whole "hacking" allegation makes it sound like a sophisticated operation that poured through pages of code to find weak spots in the DNC's computers and exploit them using the most state of the art technology. In reality, as we know from information released, John Podesta got a fake email saying "Someone tried to hack your gmail - please reset your password" and he was stupid enough to fall for it (and so was their IT guy - I don't believe for an instant that someone means to write "that's not a legitimate email" and instead writes "that's a legitimate email" - the IT guy was just being dumb, too). He reset his password (which apparently was "password", so Russia could have gotten in the same way a bored teen could have) and boom - Russia was in. That's not really sophisticated and it's yet another example of bad planning on the Hillary campaign (something that the email leak proved in spades).

Anyway, that's what happened. Did some people in the Trump campaign end up running into people from Russia? Sure, so did people from the Clinton campaign - it's Washington, that happens all the time. Claire McCaskill, who decided to bitch out AG Jeff Sessions about not disclosing a meeting with the Russian ambassador, was shamed on Twitter after saying she never met with the Russian ambassador and would remember if she had, when people posted her asking him questions at a small meeting (not the kind Sessions had, much more direct, the kind of thing you think you'd remember), and then lists of events she went to where she might have met him again. When you meet that many people you don't always remember it. I do, but most people don't.

And my God, but doesn't this whole thing reek of paranoia - "He met a Russian, he must be Trump's secret link to Putin!!!! Set him on fire!" I met the First Assistant Consul at the Russian Consulate here in NY a couple weeks ago - someone even posted a picture of me with the consul at the consulate by tagging me on FB, you can go see it. I've also met some people in the Trump Administration. Does that make ME Trump's secret link to Putin? With enough paranoia I could see people making that argument. Or what about - gasp! - when I went to my friend's wedding in Moscow in July 2015 and interacted with a leading figure in Russia who is good personal friends with Putin?

It's like 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon when you meet anyone from Russia in New York, or Washington, or Moscow. One of my clients knew Stalin's daughter. Next thing you know, I'll be accused of complicity in the Great Famine of 1932-1933. Trump's connection to Stalin! I know people who are personal friends of Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the ultranationalist Western journalists were warning would be Russia's Hitler back in the 1990s. Who knows? Maybe I met them when I actually attended a Zhirinovsky rally in Rostov-on-Don, Russia in March 1995 and watched him speak. There! Now I'm Steve Bannon's white supremacist connection to Russian neo-Nazis (though Zhirinovsky is half Jewish; maybe I should be Jared Kushner's connection to the Russian Zionist conspiracy instead).

I could go on and on. The point is that this whole circus of a witch hunt is really wearing thin on me. If someone produces evidence that the Trump administration did something wrong, then send it to the Senate and see if it sticks. Otherwise, let's drop this miserable charade and focus on things the administration is actually doing.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Comey was fired today.. - 10/05/2017 05:41:17 AM 1027 Views
The firing as such is one thing, but the timing raises major question marks. - 10/05/2017 07:29:57 AM 404 Views
What question marks? I know that is the talking point but they stop there - 10/05/2017 05:24:59 PM 301 Views
It doesn't necessarily have to be about Trump personally. - 10/05/2017 08:13:12 PM 442 Views
There is zero evidence that Flynn colluded with the Russians on the campaign - 10/05/2017 09:36:20 PM 311 Views
Aren't you confusing several things? - 11/05/2017 07:16:21 PM 278 Views
Agreed on all points. *NM* - 11/05/2017 04:26:32 PM 206 Views
I read he found out by seeing it on the news. - 10/05/2017 08:42:28 AM 439 Views
I heard he found out because he's one of Trump's twitter followers *NM* - 10/05/2017 01:58:10 PM 185 Views
I've seen it now. - 10/05/2017 10:11:59 PM 298 Views
I read that too - 10/05/2017 02:18:29 PM 440 Views
He was speaking on the west coast, at a FBI event - 11/05/2017 04:48:32 AM 308 Views
Mitch McConnell isn't worried, so I'm sure it's fine. *NM* - 10/05/2017 03:53:58 PM 219 Views
Sarcasm aside, have you seen even a shred of evidence that it was improper? - 10/05/2017 04:01:46 PM 359 Views
Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is? - 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM 336 Views
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved? - 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM 385 Views
When which now? - 10/05/2017 06:10:11 PM 294 Views
Can you point to single piece of evidence tying Trump campaign worker's to the email hacks? - 10/05/2017 09:47:00 PM 302 Views
Can *I*? No. But then I'm a landscape designer living in the UK. - 10/05/2017 11:03:56 PM 310 Views
Let's just take that one extra step - 11/05/2017 02:51:49 PM 340 Views
No I can't argue against a negative - 11/05/2017 04:45:18 AM 311 Views
I'm only surprised it didn't happen earlier - 10/05/2017 03:56:10 PM 330 Views
Doesn't that feel like The Point? - 10/05/2017 06:39:00 PM 343 Views
How can Trump prove a negative, though? - 14/05/2017 09:52:47 PM 376 Views
Indeed it does. And a lot of people rather doubt Trump would nominate someone like that. - 10/05/2017 08:00:53 PM 423 Views
That op-ed was a complete waste of time to read - 11/05/2017 07:21:15 PM 275 Views
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. - 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM 340 Views
I think you're full of shit, too. - 12/05/2017 06:25:59 AM 270 Views
The funny thing with Trump is... - 17/05/2017 06:13:54 PM 449 Views
Sorry that wss nothing but partisan babble *NM* - 12/05/2017 02:30:36 AM 249 Views
You'd think some of the HRC diehard types would be cheering. *NM* - 10/05/2017 10:24:28 PM 209 Views
I'm sick to death of all this shit. - 11/05/2017 05:10:26 PM 291 Views
Yes. - 12/05/2017 10:19:19 AM 234 Views
pics or it didn't happen *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:08:18 PM 210 Views
Mookie do not be sick, and do not call upon the spectre of death onto yourself - 12/05/2017 03:30:06 PM 258 Views
I will never reach senility - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 372 Views
damned double post - ironic considering the subject line *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 192 Views
Says the guy who doubles post - 12/05/2017 04:13:16 PM 280 Views
I'll take door number two, thank you very much. *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:20:54 PM 184 Views
Mookie your Yodaish is still a work in progress - 12/05/2017 04:33:07 PM 291 Views

Reply to Message