Active Users:240 Time:18/05/2024 02:16:02 AM
wrong damookster Send a noteboard - 08/07/2017 05:21:00 AM

It is especially annoying since I read somewhere that Spider-man in the comics was actually a college student when he got bit.

Like aero said, he was in high school in the origin story released in the summer of '62. It wasn't until three years later that he started college.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Spiderman: Homecoming (minor spoilers, maybe?) - 07/07/2017 06:20:53 PM 548 Views
It's Spider-MAN, not Spider-boy - 08/07/2017 03:53:57 AM 491 Views
Oh! I forgot! - 08/07/2017 04:11:50 AM 363 Views
wrong - 08/07/2017 05:21:00 AM 342 Views
It was a Gregg Esterbrook column. Never trust a liberal. - 09/07/2017 12:02:13 AM 335 Views
I stopped reading Easterbrook years ago - 10/07/2017 08:23:28 PM 291 Views
mook is correct you are worng - 10/07/2017 08:18:20 PM 293 Views
Still haven't seen it, feel free to spoil me anyway - 08/07/2017 04:52:32 AM 352 Views
Spider Man dies - 10/07/2017 08:19:06 PM 302 Views
He and his movies should have "died" a long time ago..... - 10/07/2017 08:20:41 PM 286 Views
Infinite - 10/07/2017 09:14:30 PM 603 Views
That is the problem with a teenage super hero - 13/07/2017 01:34:48 PM 288 Views
And like magic - 13/07/2017 01:58:23 PM 277 Views
Why do that when you can just recast and reboot and fill seats? - 19/07/2017 01:32:14 PM 235 Views
Either way works - 19/07/2017 03:18:40 PM 293 Views
Why does he have to be a teen? Hasn't the character succeed commercially past high school? - 14/07/2017 05:33:29 AM 410 Views
That was the major innovation of Spiderman - 14/07/2017 02:18:04 PM 307 Views
Re: So they should just make charcters that you relate to - 19/07/2017 01:43:47 PM 249 Views
Re: So they should just make charcters that you relate to? - 20/07/2017 12:37:34 AM 289 Views
delete stupid double post option would be nice *NM* - 20/07/2017 12:38:33 AM 139 Views
Hun stop your wish fufillment - 10/07/2017 08:43:00 PM 322 Views

Reply to Message