Active Users:358 Time:16/05/2024 05:41:52 PM
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM

View original post
Read the whole thing here. (Use the twitter link to bypass the WSJ Paywall)

https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/959637869479579648

https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-releases-gop-surveillance-memo-1517592392

But let me highlight a specific paragraph from the WSJ reporting for it counterdicts the memo / certain talking points.


The memo is critical of Mr. Steele and notes that prosecutors in their application for the warrant didn’t explicitly state that he was working for a firm funded by Democrats. But the FISA application did disclose Mr. Steele was being paid by a law firm working for a major political party, according to a person familiar with the matter. Redacting the names of U.S. people or organizations who aren’t the subject of an investigation is a common practice in government legal filings, designed to protect privacy.

This flat out contradicts Page 2 of the memo Point #1, bullet point A.

So who is telling the truth here?


Just more of Murdochs notorious "liberal media bias" yet you are falling for it yet again. REAL CONSERVATIVES are standing up to radical leftists like Murdoch; their Democratic witch hunt will NOT be allowed to continue!
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So that memo was released.... - 02/02/2018 06:59:35 PM 1113 Views
"God's in His heaven— All's right with the world!" - 02/02/2018 07:14:41 PM 650 Views
Just reading the memo is indeed the best approach, I just did too. - 02/02/2018 08:20:01 PM 680 Views
I find it hard to believe the Obama appointees in the DoJ did not know where the dossier came from *NM* - 02/02/2018 09:17:06 PM 326 Views
As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? *NM* - 02/02/2018 09:34:57 PM 362 Views
Re: As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? - 02/02/2018 10:37:21 PM 571 Views
Yes, you did misunderstand me then. - 03/02/2018 12:17:27 AM 597 Views
yes, that's makes sense. - 03/02/2018 09:41:46 AM 490 Views
It does bring up more questions... - 02/02/2018 10:53:01 PM 636 Views
Seems you already decided on some answers in advance, though. - 03/02/2018 01:53:00 AM 482 Views
With over 34,000 FISA applications just 12 (not 12,000 or 1200 or 120) were denied. - 03/02/2018 04:07:24 PM 647 Views
Correction: "just under", not "over" 34,000 - 03/02/2018 10:08:54 PM 574 Views
Bah! - 03/02/2018 11:53:05 PM 577 Views
Ok, I really did laugh out loud at that - 06/02/2018 09:16:50 PM 450 Views
Those are the ones we have to watch! - 04/02/2018 12:48:49 AM 544 Views
He's the primary demographic for the 4Chans, isn't he? *NM* - 06/02/2018 09:15:47 PM 337 Views
This part was quite revealing - 02/02/2018 08:23:28 PM 524 Views
I do find it very telling how many members of the media are suddenly opposed to transparency - 02/02/2018 08:51:28 PM 520 Views
Ironic, right? - 02/02/2018 09:12:43 PM 475 Views
So you are saying the House Intelligence Committee SHOULD release Schiffs rebuttal of Nunes' lies? - 03/02/2018 03:58:13 AM 597 Views
I am for releasing all of it - 04/02/2018 12:28:57 AM 579 Views
You, Sen. Kennedy (R-LA) and NO ONE ELSE on the right. - 04/02/2018 07:41:17 AM 916 Views
To summarize..... - 02/02/2018 09:12:06 PM 548 Views
I seem to recall much incredulity when Trump claimed he was being wire tapped - 02/02/2018 09:15:14 PM 499 Views
Er. Let me see if I'm getting this right. - 02/02/2018 09:34:14 PM 553 Views
They did somehow tap Flynn - 02/02/2018 10:44:55 PM 508 Views
Keep in mind Sessions wanted Rosenstein to resign - 02/02/2018 11:28:52 PM 438 Views
Why would SESSIONS want Rosenstein fired? - 03/02/2018 05:22:16 AM 546 Views
It was on a list of about 40 Sessions wanted fired. Probably becuase he is a lib *NM* - 04/02/2018 12:31:13 AM 358 Views
Sessions is a lib? Do you mean Libertarian? - 04/02/2018 07:57:45 AM 959 Views
Dear Joel, - 03/02/2018 04:31:18 AM 582 Views
I have - 03/02/2018 05:09:19 AM 505 Views
You’re getting to old to be this naive - 03/02/2018 05:17:44 AM 493 Views
Never said either side is the good guys - 03/02/2018 05:36:55 AM 500 Views
WSJ source - 03/02/2018 05:04:04 AM 636 Views
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM 510 Views
well as long as you have an unnaamed source it must be true *NM* - 04/02/2018 01:05:36 AM 373 Views
What is your point? *NM* - 04/02/2018 01:53:37 AM 306 Views
What is yours? - 04/02/2018 04:30:51 PM 435 Views
The key issue is being ignored - 04/02/2018 04:35:32 PM 460 Views
Answer = Hell Yes - 04/02/2018 09:00:49 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message