Active Users:435 Time:01/05/2025 02:32:22 PM
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM

View original post
Read the whole thing here. (Use the twitter link to bypass the WSJ Paywall)

https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/959637869479579648

https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-releases-gop-surveillance-memo-1517592392

But let me highlight a specific paragraph from the WSJ reporting for it counterdicts the memo / certain talking points.


The memo is critical of Mr. Steele and notes that prosecutors in their application for the warrant didn’t explicitly state that he was working for a firm funded by Democrats. But the FISA application did disclose Mr. Steele was being paid by a law firm working for a major political party, according to a person familiar with the matter. Redacting the names of U.S. people or organizations who aren’t the subject of an investigation is a common practice in government legal filings, designed to protect privacy.

This flat out contradicts Page 2 of the memo Point #1, bullet point A.

So who is telling the truth here?


Just more of Murdochs notorious "liberal media bias" yet you are falling for it yet again. REAL CONSERVATIVES are standing up to radical leftists like Murdoch; their Democratic witch hunt will NOT be allowed to continue!
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So that memo was released.... - 02/02/2018 06:59:35 PM 1256 Views
"God's in His heaven— All's right with the world!" - 02/02/2018 07:14:41 PM 839 Views
Just reading the memo is indeed the best approach, I just did too. - 02/02/2018 08:20:01 PM 831 Views
I find it hard to believe the Obama appointees in the DoJ did not know where the dossier came from *NM* - 02/02/2018 09:17:06 PM 412 Views
As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? *NM* - 02/02/2018 09:34:57 PM 452 Views
Re: As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? - 02/02/2018 10:37:21 PM 757 Views
Yes, you did misunderstand me then. - 03/02/2018 12:17:27 AM 770 Views
yes, that's makes sense. - 03/02/2018 09:41:46 AM 649 Views
It does bring up more questions... - 02/02/2018 10:53:01 PM 792 Views
Seems you already decided on some answers in advance, though. - 03/02/2018 01:53:00 AM 649 Views
With over 34,000 FISA applications just 12 (not 12,000 or 1200 or 120) were denied. - 03/02/2018 04:07:24 PM 807 Views
Correction: "just under", not "over" 34,000 - 03/02/2018 10:08:54 PM 728 Views
Bah! - 03/02/2018 11:53:05 PM 748 Views
Ok, I really did laugh out loud at that - 06/02/2018 09:16:50 PM 613 Views
Those are the ones we have to watch! - 04/02/2018 12:48:49 AM 703 Views
He's the primary demographic for the 4Chans, isn't he? *NM* - 06/02/2018 09:15:47 PM 431 Views
This part was quite revealing - 02/02/2018 08:23:28 PM 692 Views
I do find it very telling how many members of the media are suddenly opposed to transparency - 02/02/2018 08:51:28 PM 664 Views
Ironic, right? - 02/02/2018 09:12:43 PM 628 Views
So you are saying the House Intelligence Committee SHOULD release Schiffs rebuttal of Nunes' lies? - 03/02/2018 03:58:13 AM 769 Views
I am for releasing all of it - 04/02/2018 12:28:57 AM 748 Views
You, Sen. Kennedy (R-LA) and NO ONE ELSE on the right. - 04/02/2018 07:41:17 AM 1106 Views
To summarize..... - 02/02/2018 09:12:06 PM 703 Views
I seem to recall much incredulity when Trump claimed he was being wire tapped - 02/02/2018 09:15:14 PM 671 Views
Er. Let me see if I'm getting this right. - 02/02/2018 09:34:14 PM 721 Views
They did somehow tap Flynn - 02/02/2018 10:44:55 PM 668 Views
Keep in mind Sessions wanted Rosenstein to resign - 02/02/2018 11:28:52 PM 599 Views
Why would SESSIONS want Rosenstein fired? - 03/02/2018 05:22:16 AM 707 Views
It was on a list of about 40 Sessions wanted fired. Probably becuase he is a lib *NM* - 04/02/2018 12:31:13 AM 446 Views
Sessions is a lib? Do you mean Libertarian? - 04/02/2018 07:57:45 AM 1131 Views
Dear Joel, - 03/02/2018 04:31:18 AM 740 Views
I have - 03/02/2018 05:09:19 AM 672 Views
You’re getting to old to be this naive - 03/02/2018 05:17:44 AM 672 Views
Never said either side is the good guys - 03/02/2018 05:36:55 AM 655 Views
WSJ source - 03/02/2018 05:04:04 AM 806 Views
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM 673 Views
well as long as you have an unnaamed source it must be true *NM* - 04/02/2018 01:05:36 AM 452 Views
What is your point? *NM* - 04/02/2018 01:53:37 AM 382 Views
What is yours? - 04/02/2018 04:30:51 PM 583 Views
The key issue is being ignored - 04/02/2018 04:35:32 PM 612 Views
Answer = Hell Yes - 04/02/2018 09:00:49 PM 616 Views

Reply to Message