Active Users:793 Time:25/06/2026 01:51:03 AM
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM

View original post
Read the whole thing here. (Use the twitter link to bypass the WSJ Paywall)

https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/959637869479579648

https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-releases-gop-surveillance-memo-1517592392

But let me highlight a specific paragraph from the WSJ reporting for it counterdicts the memo / certain talking points.


The memo is critical of Mr. Steele and notes that prosecutors in their application for the warrant didn’t explicitly state that he was working for a firm funded by Democrats. But the FISA application did disclose Mr. Steele was being paid by a law firm working for a major political party, according to a person familiar with the matter. Redacting the names of U.S. people or organizations who aren’t the subject of an investigation is a common practice in government legal filings, designed to protect privacy.

This flat out contradicts Page 2 of the memo Point #1, bullet point A.

So who is telling the truth here?


Just more of Murdochs notorious "liberal media bias" yet you are falling for it yet again. REAL CONSERVATIVES are standing up to radical leftists like Murdoch; their Democratic witch hunt will NOT be allowed to continue!
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So that memo was released.... - 02/02/2018 06:59:35 PM 1590 Views
"God's in His heaven— All's right with the world!" - 02/02/2018 07:14:41 PM 1174 Views
Just reading the memo is indeed the best approach, I just did too. - 02/02/2018 08:20:01 PM 1179 Views
I find it hard to believe the Obama appointees in the DoJ did not know where the dossier came from *NM* - 02/02/2018 09:17:06 PM 598 Views
As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? *NM* - 02/02/2018 09:34:57 PM 629 Views
Re: As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? - 02/02/2018 10:37:21 PM 1066 Views
Yes, you did misunderstand me then. - 03/02/2018 12:17:27 AM 1080 Views
yes, that's makes sense. - 03/02/2018 09:41:46 AM 995 Views
It does bring up more questions... - 02/02/2018 10:53:01 PM 1110 Views
Seems you already decided on some answers in advance, though. - 03/02/2018 01:53:00 AM 986 Views
With over 34,000 FISA applications just 12 (not 12,000 or 1200 or 120) were denied. - 03/02/2018 04:07:24 PM 1104 Views
Correction: "just under", not "over" 34,000 - 03/02/2018 10:08:54 PM 1039 Views
Bah! - 03/02/2018 11:53:05 PM 1058 Views
Ok, I really did laugh out loud at that - 06/02/2018 09:16:50 PM 987 Views
Those are the ones we have to watch! - 04/02/2018 12:48:49 AM 1011 Views
He's the primary demographic for the 4Chans, isn't he? *NM* - 06/02/2018 09:15:47 PM 637 Views
This part was quite revealing - 02/02/2018 08:23:28 PM 1016 Views
I do find it very telling how many members of the media are suddenly opposed to transparency - 02/02/2018 08:51:28 PM 977 Views
Ironic, right? - 02/02/2018 09:12:43 PM 923 Views
So you are saying the House Intelligence Committee SHOULD release Schiffs rebuttal of Nunes' lies? - 03/02/2018 03:58:13 AM 1076 Views
I am for releasing all of it - 04/02/2018 12:28:57 AM 1070 Views
You, Sen. Kennedy (R-LA) and NO ONE ELSE on the right. - 04/02/2018 07:41:17 AM 1587 Views
To summarize..... - 02/02/2018 09:12:06 PM 991 Views
I seem to recall much incredulity when Trump claimed he was being wire tapped - 02/02/2018 09:15:14 PM 991 Views
Er. Let me see if I'm getting this right. - 02/02/2018 09:34:14 PM 1040 Views
They did somehow tap Flynn - 02/02/2018 10:44:55 PM 982 Views
Keep in mind Sessions wanted Rosenstein to resign - 02/02/2018 11:28:52 PM 906 Views
Why would SESSIONS want Rosenstein fired? - 03/02/2018 05:22:16 AM 1019 Views
It was on a list of about 40 Sessions wanted fired. Probably becuase he is a lib *NM* - 04/02/2018 12:31:13 AM 632 Views
Sessions is a lib? Do you mean Libertarian? - 04/02/2018 07:57:45 AM 1634 Views
Dear Joel, - 03/02/2018 04:31:18 AM 1068 Views
I have - 03/02/2018 05:09:19 AM 972 Views
You’re getting to old to be this naive - 03/02/2018 05:17:44 AM 1002 Views
Never said either side is the good guys - 03/02/2018 05:36:55 AM 975 Views
WSJ source - 03/02/2018 05:04:04 AM 1108 Views
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM 979 Views
well as long as you have an unnaamed source it must be true *NM* - 04/02/2018 01:05:36 AM 642 Views
What is your point? *NM* - 04/02/2018 01:53:37 AM 559 Views
What is yours? - 04/02/2018 04:30:51 PM 893 Views
The key issue is being ignored - 04/02/2018 04:35:32 PM 932 Views
Answer = Hell Yes - 04/02/2018 09:00:49 PM 899 Views

Reply to Message