Active Users:370 Time:17/09/2025 04:01:43 PM
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming Tom Send a noteboard - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM

There are certain things that kids said when I was growing up, like "that's so gay", that I would intentionally avoid saying today because I don't think it's a derogatory comment and treating it that way is insulting to gay people.

At the same time, let's be clear about why all of these supposedly homosexual remarks are being made: it's more about forced sexual shaming and power relationships than about consensual homosexuality. In my mind, that makes it even worse than casual homophobia, bad as that is, because it's essentially condoning rape or rape-like situations. This is not the language of Chelsea; it's the language of prison bitches. It's about forced (as opposed to consensual) humiliation and displays of power.

In the hypersensitive "pound#me too" world, it's amazing what people can get away with in that respect. Can you imagine someone saying that about women? Just try saying Nikki Haley "blows and rims Trump on a daily basis" - though sadly, because she's conservative maybe the Left will give even that a pass.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1216 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 546 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 525 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 553 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 283 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 531 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 273 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 601 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 509 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 542 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 550 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 538 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 523 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 469 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 528 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 554 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 543 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 540 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 516 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 580 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 622 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 505 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 517 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 571 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 514 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 495 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 531 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 525 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 511 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 514 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 527 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 536 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 532 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 526 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 383 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 521 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 526 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 263 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 537 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 496 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 504 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 553 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 500 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 572 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 572 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 529 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 594 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 496 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 546 Views

Reply to Message