Active Users:1495 Time:05/05/2026 04:55:58 PM
Regarding phobia Jeordam Send a noteboard - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM

Specifically regarding phobia...which is defined as an irrational fear or aversion to something....

I'm just wondering where the line is drawn in declaring that someone has a phobia to something as opposed to just doesn't like/approve of it. Where is that line? (Granted, the logical question to follow up on that is how does one feel that they have the ability/knowledge to determine someone else has reached phobic levels.) Coincidentally, I watched that movie from the 90's Arachnophobia (great flick by the way). In that movie, the main character has an actual issue with spiders...to the point that he freezes up when confronted with them. Through a normal day, he is a husband, father, successful doctor, but when confronted with spiders he just locks up. His behavior changes. I've read Cannoli's writings for probably over a decade now. Seen him interact with a very diverse group here. I don't see a behavior change that would demonstrate an active phobia.... I see him not agreeing with an individuals actions/life. I see him not agreeing with a social stance/belief system. I don't see a behavior change or irrational actions spurred by that fear. I don't see violence (which can be a fear response).

Here's a personal example. I don't eat sea food. From any type of fish to shellfish to any invertebrate. Not my thing. I live less than 10 minutes from the ocean. Fresh and very good seafood is but moments away from me at any given moment. I don't like it. Is this a phobia?

I know how I would characterize it, but how would you? In today's day and age, disagreement or non-approval has been equated with being a phobia or hate. They are not the same.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1320 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 647 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 632 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 650 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 328 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 628 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 316 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 703 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 608 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 648 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 639 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 669 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 630 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 560 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 617 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 649 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 635 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 643 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 607 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 681 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 743 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 600 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 608 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 673 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 625 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 593 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 618 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 626 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 615 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 620 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 625 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 628 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 623 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 624 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 429 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 620 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 625 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 304 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 638 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 624 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 597 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 657 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 590 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 669 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 669 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 655 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 703 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 594 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 646 Views

Reply to Message