Active Users:3568 Time:20/06/2026 12:49:25 AM
Regarding phobia Jeordam Send a noteboard - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM

Specifically regarding phobia...which is defined as an irrational fear or aversion to something....

I'm just wondering where the line is drawn in declaring that someone has a phobia to something as opposed to just doesn't like/approve of it. Where is that line? (Granted, the logical question to follow up on that is how does one feel that they have the ability/knowledge to determine someone else has reached phobic levels.) Coincidentally, I watched that movie from the 90's Arachnophobia (great flick by the way). In that movie, the main character has an actual issue with spiders...to the point that he freezes up when confronted with them. Through a normal day, he is a husband, father, successful doctor, but when confronted with spiders he just locks up. His behavior changes. I've read Cannoli's writings for probably over a decade now. Seen him interact with a very diverse group here. I don't see a behavior change that would demonstrate an active phobia.... I see him not agreeing with an individuals actions/life. I see him not agreeing with a social stance/belief system. I don't see a behavior change or irrational actions spurred by that fear. I don't see violence (which can be a fear response).

Here's a personal example. I don't eat sea food. From any type of fish to shellfish to any invertebrate. Not my thing. I live less than 10 minutes from the ocean. Fresh and very good seafood is but moments away from me at any given moment. I don't like it. Is this a phobia?

I know how I would characterize it, but how would you? In today's day and age, disagreement or non-approval has been equated with being a phobia or hate. They are not the same.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1336 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 664 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 652 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 666 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 341 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 647 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 327 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 732 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 627 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 672 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 660 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 687 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 649 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 582 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 639 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 668 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 654 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 661 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 623 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 697 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 760 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 622 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 626 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 689 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 643 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 614 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 640 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 646 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 632 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 642 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 644 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 649 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 643 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 641 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 440 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 644 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 644 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 316 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 660 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 644 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 612 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 675 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 607 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 689 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 688 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 671 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 724 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 611 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 662 Views

Reply to Message