Active Users:413 Time:17/06/2025 12:41:01 AM
Phobia fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM

View original post
I openly acknowledge the truth that homosexuality is a grave sin, right up there with heterosexual fornication. The naturally pedantic inclinations that seem to come with being a rafonaut might incline to wonder how I can be demonstrated to be irrationally afraid of the same, which is what 'homophobia' means, or homosexuals, if we are to make allowances.

Phobia, Cannoli, also applies to a strong aversion. Irrational fear need not be present for phobia to apply.

You clearly show aversion to homosexuality, unless you are attracted to "grave sin", and thus, you are a homophobe.


And if you ARE going to be discriminatory toward sexual submissives... so what?... in the second place, wouldn't most of them like it?

No. Being sexually submissive in the context of a consensual sexual encounter really doesn't mean you will "like it" when a random person decides to demean and insult you. Secondly, being a bottom doesn't mean you are submissive.

As for the word "sucks", your comparison with the word stinks fails because the authors point is not that each instance of using "sucks" represents an insult to sexually submissive people, but instead points to how deeply embedded our contempt for people on the receptive end of intercourse is. That aspect is part of our daily language. And the word sucks isn't used exclusively by people who hate homosexuality, which is precisely the author's point.


The whole piece strikes me as yet another permutation of these sorts of people to signal their own virtue by inventing new sins with which to chastise their fellow believers.

Like the guys who decided homosexuality is a sin to signal virtue in their own heterosexuality?


It's the age old problem of the sanctimonious:

Indeed. And so deep is your own sanctimony that you fail to see the irony in railing about sins invented for virtue-signaling while doing the same damn thing just a few paragraphs above!

Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1188 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 521 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 487 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 502 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 270 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 500 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 261 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 549 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 481 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 510 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 523 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 510 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 496 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 445 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 467 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 526 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 517 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 512 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 485 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 527 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 595 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 481 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 488 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 517 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 489 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 461 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 502 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 498 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 479 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 484 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 498 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 509 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 509 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 499 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 368 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 492 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 495 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 250 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 507 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 465 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 476 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 523 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 470 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 543 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 507 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 500 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 563 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 465 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 517 Views

Reply to Message