Active Users:379 Time:01/05/2025 08:08:02 PM
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM


It isn't supposed to do so in any way involving government action, true, but even the most liberal of societies police speech. Meaning, you can say whatever you like, but there are and should be societal consequences. Make racist anti-Jewish rants? I'm not going to invite you to my parties.

Antisemitophobe! But, yeah, this is exactly how it goes and what is meant by freedom of association. Freedom of association is the only acceptable check on free speech. And it HAS to go both ways. Whether the freedom to disallow anti-semites OR Jews from your association. If you don't have to write "Happy Birthday Adolf Hitler" on a cake (and you shouldn't), you also don't have to put two groom or two bride figures on top of a wedding cake.
Nor will I patronize your business. As a potential employer, I might not hire you. To say that "freedom of speech" is somehow equal to "freedom from consequences for my speech" is ludicrous. A sufficiently liberal society would be reluctant to use such tools; confining it to only those who represent the most extreme and/or dangerous views. And shouldn't be used to silence those with "controversial" views, as you should have a right to "speak". But again, as with many things in life, you should have the freedom to do it, but are not free from the consequences.

Exactly. So long as the consequences are the result of individual choice, and not legislation or judicial action.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1179 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 514 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 480 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 491 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 263 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 491 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 258 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 543 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 475 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 500 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 515 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 504 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 493 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 440 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 464 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 518 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 508 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 502 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 482 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 522 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 590 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 471 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 484 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 512 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 482 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 458 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 497 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 492 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 477 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 478 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 495 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 504 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 501 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 489 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 296 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 488 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 483 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 248 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 500 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 458 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 468 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 519 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 467 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 540 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 499 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 492 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 555 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 459 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 508 Views

Reply to Message