Active Users:499 Time:07/01/2026 08:25:13 AM
I can't aerocontrols Send a noteboard - 17/12/2018 02:34:17 PM

View original post
Then I judge them like fantasy not science fiction. Sort of like comic book movies and Star Wars movies. You have to have some actual science to call it science fiction. The one who use bad science bother me more than the ones who use not science at all. Matrix is a great example of one that uses very bad science, the idea that you could use human as batteries is not only stupid it is lazy.

...and the Matrix is a good example. I could theoretically accept as a fantasy premise that humans could be used as batteries, even though I know the idea is scientifically bunk, but I can't accept that AND ignore the fact that if the AIs could use organic creatures as batteries, they would have a lot less trouble using cattle or lobotomized humans as batteries. Or just simulate a 'Matrix' set in the year 1600 so your human subjects have no way to escape or cause trouble.

Hollywood has the best moral compass, because it has compassion.
Reply to message
Is there an uncanny valley of sci-fi hardness? - 14/12/2018 03:17:46 PM 494 Views
the trailers look stupid - 14/12/2018 05:01:30 PM 335 Views
The premise is the only thing that made me want to see it - 15/12/2018 04:09:16 PM 354 Views
I just look at them as fantasy with a technology theme - 17/12/2018 01:04:12 PM 325 Views
I can't - 17/12/2018 02:34:17 PM 298 Views
or just use nuclear power - 17/12/2018 10:20:43 PM 315 Views
There are ways you could make sense of the Matrix if you try. (Doing so is of course absurd.) - 18/12/2018 01:26:56 AM 313 Views
My final sentence allows for that - 18/12/2018 02:21:19 PM 307 Views
Looks like the moviegoing public agrees - 18/12/2018 03:11:28 AM 333 Views

Reply to Message