It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
Isaac Send a noteboard - 20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
Since most of the active players have already posted a code I'm taking that as tacit consent.... the nice thing about this though is that if everyone is using a decent code we can scrub the mission all the way up to the last minute, leaving all the codes out there uncracked, which is something to keep in mind since I'm sure we'll see this tactic again now that jack's out of the proverbial box.
Codes, codes, codes... remember when making the code that shorter is better, a couple padding characters never hurts and for real short role names its a good idea to pad up to at least 10, but the longer a code, the easier it is to crack, short messages are virtually impossible to crack, but short gives something away, a hybrid character obviously can't properly RC with 3 or 4 letters even if they abbreviate, cop and doc are very short, most roles aren't, etc. Padding in this context is simply making the message longer, either before or after the encryption, like encrypting "I Am the Cop" instead of just Cop.
The big thing, and this needs emphasizing, is that since a message that's hard to break is the goal, the means for breaking it has to be something that on reveal seems unarguably genuine, you can hint around it, like referencing smells "This massclaim idea smells fishy to me" then using "Rotten Salmon" as the key, because there's about zero chance in hell of anyone guessing that even if they realize the above quote is the hint, but when pointed out, its taken as a given. Don't use some random string of numbers or letters, which is what you'd do if you were genuinely trying to make something uncrackable, because you can make any words you want out of a string of code with the right choice of numbers, so the decrypt is highly suspect. The whole idea behind this is to be able to prove your RC was set in stone before you heard anyone else's RC, so if your decryption key isn't highly credible it will make you suspect. Making your key, and thus your uninformed claim, highly credible is more important than making your code unbreakable.
Codes, codes, codes... remember when making the code that shorter is better, a couple padding characters never hurts and for real short role names its a good idea to pad up to at least 10, but the longer a code, the easier it is to crack, short messages are virtually impossible to crack, but short gives something away, a hybrid character obviously can't properly RC with 3 or 4 letters even if they abbreviate, cop and doc are very short, most roles aren't, etc. Padding in this context is simply making the message longer, either before or after the encryption, like encrypting "I Am the Cop" instead of just Cop.
The big thing, and this needs emphasizing, is that since a message that's hard to break is the goal, the means for breaking it has to be something that on reveal seems unarguably genuine, you can hint around it, like referencing smells "This massclaim idea smells fishy to me" then using "Rotten Salmon" as the key, because there's about zero chance in hell of anyone guessing that even if they realize the above quote is the hint, but when pointed out, its taken as a given. Don't use some random string of numbers or letters, which is what you'd do if you were genuinely trying to make something uncrackable, because you can make any words you want out of a string of code with the right choice of numbers, so the decrypt is highly suspect. The whole idea behind this is to be able to prove your RC was set in stone before you heard anyone else's RC, so if your decryption key isn't highly credible it will make you suspect. Making your key, and thus your uninformed claim, highly credible is more important than making your code unbreakable.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
- 1785 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
- 579 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
- 954 Views
Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
- 919 Views

Re: Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
- 996 Views

plus...
15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
- 886 Views
Voting Record
18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
- 894 Views
Moving along
15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
- 1140 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
- 508 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
- 941 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 1035 Views
my current suspects
15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
- 1040 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
- 529 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
- 984 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
- 809 Views
I can
18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
- 906 Views
Nay
18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 948 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
- 950 Views
We need to come up with a plan
19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
- 930 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
- 905 Views
? is the logical target
19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
- 898 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
- 927 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
- 879 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
- 913 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
- 865 Views
I think I have a plan
20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
- 1045 Views
...erm...
20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
- 1018 Views
Crypto tricks
20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
- 956 Views
Some thoughts...
19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
- 827 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
- 857 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
- 988 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
- 925 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
- 897 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
- 868 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
- 873 Views
That is correct. *NM*
21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
- 533 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
- 889 Views
Okay
21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
- 912 Views
Re: Okay
21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
- 864 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
- 537 Views
horsefeathers
21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
- 845 Views

It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
- 546 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this.
*NM*
21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
- 493 Views

List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
- 1030 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
- 485 Views
A couple Questions
21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
- 885 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
- 963 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
- 868 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
- 878 Views
what now?
22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
- 814 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
- 944 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
- 913 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
- 951 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 894 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
- 956 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
- 603 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
- 958 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
- 913 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
- 954 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
- 960 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
- 899 Views
eh, what the heck
24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
- 795 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
- 545 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
- 415 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
- 788 Views
right, mine
24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
- 950 Views
Re: right, mine
24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
- 897 Views
EPWOP
24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
- 909 Views
Re: EPWOP
24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
- 941 Views
Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
- 871 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
- 954 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
- 790 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
- 866 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
- 1005 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
- 860 Views
EBWOP
25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
- 856 Views
It's probably also worth noting
25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 904 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
- 930 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
- 970 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
- 832 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
- 860 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
- 920 Views
not to mention...
26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
- 894 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
- 561 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
- 1034 Views

Somebody want to hammer?
26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
- 920 Views