Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
Isaac Send a noteboard - 20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
In fact, looking back, my method is rather roundabout.
Should I make a new one, in more of your fashion, or leave my own?
Only if you feel the decrypt isn't obvious on review. As an exmaple, if I encrypted Tracker with "I love mafia" by simple letter to number conversion and addition, it doesn't really need clues or hints, but its still a good idea. If you encrypted it with 3561749057 (some random number string I just created by mashing my number pad) then yeah, definitely redo it, because it leaves you open to accusation of reverse-engineering a key after you've seen other's RC's. If people want to avoid using a word, then they need a patterned number of some sort - time stamp, post number, the first ten digits of a physical constant, etc. But in these days of google, searching a number string you create to find something that makes it meaningful and thus believable isn't too hard, so the codes are really best if something conclusively hinting at the key is used. All that matters is that everyone else can be reasonably satisfied you didn't reverse-engineer your key, so like someone's telephone number as the key is a real bad choice, unless its a distinct and meaningful one beyond doubt, like the White House Switchboard as opposed to Bob's Liquor Store in Jersey, since that would just look like you found a sequence of numbers (very easy, should take someone only a couple minutes) that makes your code say what you want it to then found something that connected to it. You can use something really arcane like the first 10 digits of the speed of light as given in inches per fortnight but then you really need to include in the message you give your code some reference to inch, light, and fortnight, like "We keep inching along, I don't like days taking two weeks, it seems a big waste of time since we just end up killing a lightsider anyway, not that I'm suggesting we try to move at lightspeed or something but we need to pick up the pace a bit" and so on.
So, its your judgement call to make, if you feel your code will be highly credible as is, leave it be, if not, or if in doubt, redo, or even just post a reply and encrypt your previous key this way instead of your role name. Probably a longer answer than you needed, but I figured I might as well go into depth for everyone.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
1935 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
- 15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
667 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
- 15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
1073 Views
Arrrgggh
- 15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
1036 Views
- 15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
1036 Views
Re: Arrrgggh
- 15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
1116 Views
- 15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
1116 Views
plus...
- 15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
1030 Views
Voting Record
- 18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
1001 Views
Moving along
- 15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
1279 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
- 15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
566 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
1068 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
1175 Views
my current suspects
- 15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
1234 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
- 15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
602 Views
Expanding the list
- 16/09/2010 05:37:24 AM
1077 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
- 18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
1130 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
- 18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
938 Views
I can
- 18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
1054 Views
Nay
- 18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
1088 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
- 18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
1080 Views
We need to come up with a plan
- 19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
1049 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
- 19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
1028 Views
? is the logical target
- 19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
1002 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
- 20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
1058 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
- 20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
1008 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
- 20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
1034 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
- 20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
1006 Views
I think I have a plan
- 20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
1162 Views
...erm...
- 20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
1150 Views
Crypto tricks
- 20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
1103 Views
Some thoughts...
- 19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
935 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
- 19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
987 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
- 20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
1125 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
1036 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
1054 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
975 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
- 21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
990 Views
That is correct. *NM*
- 21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
617 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
- 21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
1018 Views
Okay
- 21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
1037 Views
Re: Okay
- 21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
975 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
- 21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
585 Views
horsefeathers
- 21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
967 Views
- 21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
967 Views
It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
- 21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
616 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this.
*NM*
- 21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
548 Views
*NM*
- 21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
548 Views
List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
- 21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
1152 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
- 21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
537 Views
A couple Questions
- 21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
982 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
- 21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
1113 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
- 22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
979 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
- 22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
1025 Views
what now?
- 22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
941 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
- 22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
1059 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
- 23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
1042 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
- 23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
1085 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
- 23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
1034 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
- 23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
1077 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
658 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
- 23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
1075 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
- 23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
1011 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
- 23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
1101 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
- 24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
1093 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
- 24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
1032 Views
eh, what the heck
- 24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
949 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
595 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
476 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
- 24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
910 Views
right, mine
- 24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
1077 Views
Re: right, mine
- 24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
1006 Views
EPWOP
- 24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
1022 Views
Re: EPWOP
- 24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
1071 Views
Okay, that squares
- 24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
1023 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
- 24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
1075 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
- 24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
904 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
- 24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
988 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
- 25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
1110 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
- 25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
977 Views
EBWOP
- 25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
989 Views
It's probably also worth noting
- 25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
1032 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
- 26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
1042 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
- 26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
1085 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
- 26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
949 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
- 26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
986 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
- 26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
1050 Views
not to mention...
- 26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
1036 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
618 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
- 26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
1183 Views
- 26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
1183 Views
Somebody want to hammer?
- 26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
1044 Views

*NM*