Welcome to today's science lesson!
I chose to base my code on the Periodic Table of the Elements. When Isaac posted his example in his "Crypto tricks" post and used "Helium" as his key, it was such a marvelous coincidence that I couldn't resist adding in "a key such as Isaac referred to in his last post." The key that I posted in that followup post was also Helium.
"#" = "Helium"
If you look at a table of ASCII codes, # is number 35. 33 is the first number on the aforementioned table of ASCII codes that gives a non-blank character. So, let us subtract 33 from 35. That leaves 2, and 2 is the Atomic Number of Helium. And that is also a marvelous coincidence, because that is not what my code is based on. The Atomic Weight of Helium is approximately 4.0026. Let us round that to the nearest integer, and subtract the number of protons in a Helium atom which is equal to the Atomic Number, in this case 2. That gives the number of neutrons in the most common isotope of Helium, which is also 2. Now replace the "#" with the symbol for Helium, "He", and that is the basis of my code.
I used the words "positive" and "neutral" in that second post to refer to the sub-atomic particles used arrive at the correct numbers.
Now, looking at my actual code: k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
"k" is 107 on the ASCII table. Subtract 33 and you get 74. I had anticipated an extra layer of protection here, in that even if people knew what the method was, they would be unfamiliar enough with the elements that this would be a lengthy process of trial and error as they added various Atomic Numbers until they arrived at a suitable Atomic Weight. This particular aspect of my plan was foiled by Google, who will be happy to tell you all about Iodine if you enter a search for "74 neutrons." The Atomic Number for Iodine is 53. 53 + 74 = 127 which is the Atomic Weight of that element's most common isotope. The symbol of Iodine is "I" so "k" = "I".
Moving on, "?" is 181 on the ASCII table. Subtracting 33 will give 148. If someone was still under the mistaken impression that we were dealing with Atomic Numbers at this point, this would convince them otherwise, as the Periodic Table currently only goes up to 118. Solving for neutrons, we can find that we are looking at good old Americium, symbol "Am".
Continue this for each character in the code and
k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
becomes
I Am Am O Dy F I Dy Ac Ti O N Co P
Clean up a little spacing
I Am A mODyFIDy AcTiON CoP
and you have my role claim. I know, "modified" is incorrectly spelled as "mODyFIDy" but that was unavoidable given the limitations of the character set I was working with. I trust that it is still recognizable.
I chose to base my code on the Periodic Table of the Elements. When Isaac posted his example in his "Crypto tricks" post and used "Helium" as his key, it was such a marvelous coincidence that I couldn't resist adding in "a key such as Isaac referred to in his last post." The key that I posted in that followup post was also Helium.
"#" = "Helium"
If you look at a table of ASCII codes, # is number 35. 33 is the first number on the aforementioned table of ASCII codes that gives a non-blank character. So, let us subtract 33 from 35. That leaves 2, and 2 is the Atomic Number of Helium. And that is also a marvelous coincidence, because that is not what my code is based on. The Atomic Weight of Helium is approximately 4.0026. Let us round that to the nearest integer, and subtract the number of protons in a Helium atom which is equal to the Atomic Number, in this case 2. That gives the number of neutrons in the most common isotope of Helium, which is also 2. Now replace the "#" with the symbol for Helium, "He", and that is the basis of my code.
I used the words "positive" and "neutral" in that second post to refer to the sub-atomic particles used arrive at the correct numbers.
Now, looking at my actual code: k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
"k" is 107 on the ASCII table. Subtract 33 and you get 74. I had anticipated an extra layer of protection here, in that even if people knew what the method was, they would be unfamiliar enough with the elements that this would be a lengthy process of trial and error as they added various Atomic Numbers until they arrived at a suitable Atomic Weight. This particular aspect of my plan was foiled by Google, who will be happy to tell you all about Iodine if you enter a search for "74 neutrons." The Atomic Number for Iodine is 53. 53 + 74 = 127 which is the Atomic Weight of that element's most common isotope. The symbol of Iodine is "I" so "k" = "I".
Moving on, "?" is 181 on the ASCII table. Subtracting 33 will give 148. If someone was still under the mistaken impression that we were dealing with Atomic Numbers at this point, this would convince them otherwise, as the Periodic Table currently only goes up to 118. Solving for neutrons, we can find that we are looking at good old Americium, symbol "Am".
Continue this for each character in the code and
k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
becomes
I Am Am O Dy F I Dy Ac Ti O N Co P
Clean up a little spacing
I Am A mODyFIDy AcTiON CoP
and you have my role claim. I know, "modified" is incorrectly spelled as "mODyFIDy" but that was unavoidable given the limitations of the character set I was working with. I trust that it is still recognizable.
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
1899 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
- 15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
638 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
- 15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
1042 Views
Arrrgggh
- 15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
1006 Views
- 15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
1006 Views
Re: Arrrgggh
- 15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
1082 Views
- 15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
1082 Views
plus...
- 15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
998 Views
Voting Record
- 18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
975 Views
Moving along
- 15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
1239 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
- 15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
549 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
1034 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
1144 Views
my current suspects
- 15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
1163 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
- 15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
575 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
- 18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
1098 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
- 18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
902 Views
I can
- 18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
1015 Views
Nay
- 18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
1053 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
- 18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
1053 Views
We need to come up with a plan
- 19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
1013 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
- 19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
996 Views
? is the logical target
- 19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
976 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
- 20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
1019 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
- 20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
976 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
- 20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
1002 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
- 20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
977 Views
I think I have a plan
- 20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
1130 Views
...erm...
- 20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
1122 Views
Crypto tricks
- 20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
1070 Views
Some thoughts...
- 19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
911 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
- 19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
959 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
- 20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
1099 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
1009 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
1010 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
957 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
- 21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
958 Views
That is correct. *NM*
- 21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
592 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
- 21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
988 Views
Okay
- 21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
1002 Views
Re: Okay
- 21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
942 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
- 21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
576 Views
horsefeathers
- 21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
927 Views
- 21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
927 Views
It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
- 21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
595 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this.
*NM*
- 21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
534 Views
*NM*
- 21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
534 Views
List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
- 21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
1120 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
- 21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
522 Views
A couple Questions
- 21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
957 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
- 21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
1078 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
- 22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
945 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
- 22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
981 Views
what now?
- 22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
912 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
- 22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
1032 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
- 23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
1010 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
- 23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
1057 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
- 23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
998 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
- 23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
1047 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
641 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
- 23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
1049 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
- 23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
988 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
- 23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
1074 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
- 24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
1064 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
- 24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
1002 Views
eh, what the heck
- 24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
906 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
580 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
458 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
- 24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
875 Views
right, mine
- 24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
1043 Views
Re: right, mine
- 24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
987 Views
EPWOP
- 24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
996 Views
Re: EPWOP
- 24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
1036 Views
Okay, that squares
- 24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
977 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
- 24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
1044 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
- 24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
875 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
- 24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
955 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
- 25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
1090 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
- 25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
952 Views
EBWOP
- 25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
951 Views
It's probably also worth noting
- 25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
1002 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
- 26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
1017 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
- 26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
1057 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
- 26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
926 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
- 26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
963 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
- 26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
1013 Views
not to mention...
- 26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
1012 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
600 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
- 26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
1155 Views
- 26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
1155 Views
Somebody want to hammer?
- 26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
1021 Views

*NM*