By "Town" you mean 'cop'. There's no reason for FT to be so sure of my alignment and to keep harping about how sure his is, so you guys think that because he HC'd me guilty he's the cop and holding it back. First off, FT has previously advocated cop's lying about their day 1 results to avoid being picked up and has repeatedly selected outliers like the night 1 victim. Last I checked we also have a tacit agreement not to cop or NK each other on night 1, he knows I keep my word so it would be kind of shocking for him to cop me and not only leave himself open to retaliation but but practically beg it, since even if I didn't reply in kind someone would do it just to because it was a great chance to remove a major threat while pointing the finger at another one. As someone who's been basically the main inheritor of our action magnet status, I think you can appreciate how valuable I and presumably he consider such a truce. We didn't say anything about HCing each other though. He'd have tried to cop me on nmight 2, like he tried to do at Paradise Hotel, and keep the pact. FT's also been convinced of my guilt since Day 1, pre-night action. I know he's not, or flawed, but the implications works well for him. He's also said not only how sure he is, but also claimed not only to think I might possibly be innocent but to have taken actions I'd flagged as suspicious because they were contingencies if I wasn't guilty.

He's not claimed cop, were he one and copped me he would have said so, because he'd know not revealing after finding such a major player 'guilty' would bring the claim into doubt. It also lets him avoid claiming and getting counter-claimed, scum or town, the implication of certainty without the baggage of claiming it. FT hates RCing, he avoids ever giving any info away, but that doesn't mean he's above trying to imply he is one.