Re: I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
Isaac Send a noteboard - 17/11/2010 07:09:14 PM
You may not believe it, but I rarely check the hypocop table during the Day. It's all confusing misleading trails, so why bother? I had not noticed the significance or implications of him hypocopping you until you posted about it just now. Seriously.
Lord, then why? Was I right about us being almost all masoned after all? IF so then why this surety my team must be infected? Why do you apparently trust him? I cna't help but feel it might be a bit relevant to my case, you basically just said "I think I trust him, but it makes me uncomfortable for him to have my role information. He knows I'm not scum, but I have no such assurances that he is not." What do you mean by this? Why do you trust him?
In particular, the single-minded ferocity with which he's decided to bring you down. That says "town" to me. Scum don't make those kind of gambles, and bear in mind that I am speaking of my mindset before he revealed himself to be the Cop, not afterward. Though if anything, that revelation has assured my initial feelings on the matter. You are a formidable opponent, Isaac, but not such much that the scum would be willing to sacrifice F-T (also a very valuable asset) to get you lynched. Because that's pretty much exactly what's going to happen if you turn up innocent Tonight - F-T's going to get it. I don't think that's a gamble worth taking on Day 2 for the scum - the costs outweigh the benefits. There are easier far, far easier targets that can be brought down in a way that spreads the guilt for the Lynch around. Hell, that's exactly what we do every other game, and that's basically what we did Yesterday to WF.
That's a sound enough analysis, IMHO, the problem is while I don't think FT would gamble off the SPLOG claim or sacrifice himself, it is clear he thinks its him or me, personally I tihnk we'll end up going for one of the other five voters if we don't hit me. The problem is, while the FT-as-scummer option seems ludicrous for a sacrifice, the idea that my scummer allies would serve me up on a platter pre-cop admission is, well, highly unrealistic.
The SPLOG thing only cements it further. There's no way F-T is scum, unless there are two fractions. That's a ridiculous, ridiculous claim to make just to get you lynched. Totally not worth it, I am forced to assume he is telling the truth. Perhaps he is limited in some way, or insane. But he's not scum.
I don't think he's scum either, not much anyway, though I'll be happier once people confirm they don't have the SPLOG, since he seems to think he's dead if I'm not, and has ample prior evidence to believe as much, and that can apply as much to scum as town. I've been pondering my scribble note from game start, let me try for an optimal paraphrase:
"You need an access code for the SPLOG"
That's obviously not the real wording. Anyway, my intial take on that was that Hobo or Fox had the codes to open the case, which is listed as intact in the Intro, its our building so to speak. Simple easy, which is why my first NB to Hobo and Fox stressed not admitting to having the device if they did, one scummer, one cop, one hardened brute with clue made a lot of sense. However the wording could just as easily have meant that you need the right code to use the thing, its never explicitly stated the device was locked up, so maybe he didn't have to thief his way into it and just picked it up not knowing he had the right access key. Previously I'd just assumed post-WF that if it had a flaw it probably was iffy about mutant or non-human DNA, superheroes being so full of such things, and a damaged cop fits with a secondary investigator decently well. Its not surprising of course, two investigators (and we might have more, semi or full) pretty much mandated the scummers have some edge in that respect, undetectable, frame-ability, etc. I'd hardly be a surprising target for a frame-role but I'd assume the more logical explanation is that the SPLOG just doesn't work because you need a key to use it, as opposed to my original interpretation of being in a locked box, I'm picturing the thing as a gun like device, one locks such things up as opposed to sticking a keypad on it or something.
Probably the core thing to keep in mind is the numbers aspect, the lynch record just doesn't jibe with available estimates and the bulletproof watcher tossed in pretty much requires some sort of investigatory shenanigans, our cops have been damaged goods about half the time of late, pretty much since the whitecloak investigator first appeared in game 5, if FT has a fully functional device then its a safe bet the scummers have bigger numbers - screwing up the lynch numbers even worse - or they have protection or misdirection. I can produce a lot of theories, like fist used his mega-hex and they had a roled framer, target whoever you feel like and conjunction, etc, he just absorbs everything. But I think the most probable is that the thing just doesn't work properly without a code. I'd considered the probability it might have been removed from a locked case by everything from super-thief to teleportation but She-Hulk wouldn't fit that, and the case is verifiably intact, so I assume I just took the incorrect route on ambiguous wording.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 19: Superlative Crisis! ISSUE TWO: BLACK MAGIC- WHOA, MAN!
03/11/2010 04:59:59 AM
- 2691 Views
I see two avenues to discuss here
03/11/2010 11:41:14 AM
- 916 Views
I was thinking about number 1.
03/11/2010 10:00:57 PM
- 937 Views
Regarding 2, and let me suggets a 3
04/11/2010 02:30:41 AM
- 974 Views
I, personally, agree with Isaac so here goes.
04/11/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 905 Views
O.......K..........
05/11/2010 11:43:14 PM
- 885 Views
Did Fist use his power last Night?
06/11/2010 03:41:05 AM
- 926 Views
It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 04:53:19 AM
- 900 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 05:30:00 PM
- 900 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 07:15:11 PM
- 949 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 08:18:16 AM
- 985 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 03:38:37 PM
- 951 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:42:10 PM
- 989 Views
Huh, well Fox straight up told us his Mason group was a 3rd Fraction on Night 1
11/11/2010 12:55:50 AM
- 946 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:16:29 PM
- 996 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 07:16:20 PM
- 938 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 09:29:12 PM
- 1013 Views
I am about 95% sure that WF targeted me last Night.
11/11/2010 01:04:34 AM
- 926 Views
Interesting.
11/11/2010 02:25:07 AM
- 953 Views
It's certainly possible.
11/11/2010 02:39:00 AM
- 944 Views
Now I'm curious
11/11/2010 03:33:46 AM
- 993 Views
Presumably because I'm not trying to get her lynched.
11/11/2010 03:53:54 AM
- 978 Views
Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 05:41:04 AM
- 994 Views
Re: Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 04:18:17 PM
- 998 Views
a scummer got caught on day one in the tower game
04/11/2010 06:42:15 PM
- 969 Views
also there was that time someone said they saw a black light instead of white
04/11/2010 07:52:41 PM
- 942 Views
That was Hobo in DK's crossover game. *NM*
04/11/2010 08:16:07 PM
- 520 Views
You know we could just forget about that. I wouldn't complain.
*NM*
05/11/2010 08:35:03 PM
- 564 Views

Hypocop? *NM*
03/11/2010 03:20:17 PM
- 572 Views
So help me I will spoil the entirety of ToM, people! (not just yet, though)
10/11/2010 02:51:46 AM
- 859 Views
I'm pretty sure if you do, you'll be lynched. *NM*
10/11/2010 09:19:43 PM
- 537 Views
Vote: No Lynch
13/11/2010 12:24:43 AM
- 956 Views
I am very much opposed to this idea
13/11/2010 02:04:27 PM
- 886 Views
Then offer an alternative
13/11/2010 11:10:42 PM
- 938 Views
Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:03:35 AM
- 860 Views
Re: Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:21:12 AM
- 926 Views
I had no RBIRL because my computer died.
14/11/2010 06:52:56 AM
- 849 Views
Ah, I see you did unvote. Very well. I still got my eye on you. *NM*
14/11/2010 06:55:30 AM
- 470 Views
LOL - I guess this is also my informal defense
14/11/2010 08:52:56 AM
- 929 Views
Saying it's not out-of-character to be scummy doesn't make you any less scummy.
14/11/2010 04:33:15 PM
- 936 Views
Watch the difference between what he says and what he is accused of.
14/11/2010 07:08:08 PM
- 816 Views
After this whole argument I've had with FT...
13/11/2010 11:42:32 PM
- 899 Views
People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 03:43:14 AM
- 861 Views
Re: People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 02:23:04 PM
- 1038 Views
Vote: Isaac
13/11/2010 11:58:56 PM
- 975 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 03:02:15 AM
- 884 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 04:02:30 AM
- 964 Views
What was scummy?
14/11/2010 04:10:12 AM
- 1002 Views
Re: What was scummy?
14/11/2010 05:41:44 AM
- 919 Views
Extrmely thin
14/11/2010 06:05:32 AM
- 1073 Views
Actually...
14/11/2010 06:55:02 AM
- 971 Views
Re: Actually...
14/11/2010 07:44:33 AM
- 925 Views
Did you guys just blitz me?
14/11/2010 11:35:58 PM
- 957 Views

Your not hammered yet are you?
14/11/2010 11:46:29 PM
- 885 Views
I think I might be, can never be sure what votes are worth in a heavy role game
14/11/2010 11:50:51 PM
- 908 Views
I'm potentially alive on a technicality
15/11/2010 12:02:36 AM
- 811 Views
Why don't you go ahead and claim then?
15/11/2010 12:11:03 AM
- 903 Views
Sure
15/11/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 876 Views
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
15/11/2010 02:13:23 AM
- 977 Views
I think so.
15/11/2010 01:25:46 AM
- 879 Views
Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:32:44 AM
- 886 Views
Re: Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:58:26 AM
- 1019 Views
Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:22:06 AM
- 832 Views
Re: Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:35:49 AM
- 935 Views
I'm unvoting only if the defence is really foolproof, since now no-one can hammer without instantly
15/11/2010 07:18:05 AM
- 920 Views
EBWOP - The "only" in the title is rebundant, it was part of different title I abandoned. *NM*
15/11/2010 07:19:46 AM
- 562 Views
I guess the first title stands afterall I won't automatically unvote just because none should hammer
15/11/2010 08:19:00 AM
- 826 Views
I'll try to help Isaac out a bit here.
15/11/2010 01:11:11 PM
- 753 Views
Thanks, and a question too
15/11/2010 01:30:17 PM
- 830 Views
Well, I'll unvote if the third mason comes forward too. *NM*
15/11/2010 03:30:36 PM
- 515 Views
Jeez, when it rains, it pours
15/11/2010 10:34:54 PM
- 800 Views
OK Isaac
15/11/2010 11:14:45 PM
- 849 Views
My Defense Posts
16/11/2010 04:16:41 AM
- 866 Views
Defense A: The Fantastic Four
16/11/2010 04:31:11 AM
- 899 Views
Defense B: The Numbers Game
16/11/2010 04:36:59 AM
- 903 Views
"What motive would a scummer have"?
16/11/2010 05:56:04 PM
- 895 Views
Without any further questions though?
16/11/2010 11:51:42 PM
- 927 Views
If you see an avalanche coming, you hop on board (NOT a metaphor).
17/11/2010 12:12:31 AM
- 858 Views
Defense C: The Intro Flavor
16/11/2010 04:41:31 AM
- 1004 Views
Eh ...
16/11/2010 10:00:21 PM
- 848 Views
Re: Eh ...
17/11/2010 02:33:27 AM
- 911 Views
We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 07:01:22 AM
- 948 Views
Re: We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 01:40:21 PM
- 841 Views
Yes, that was it.
16/11/2010 09:05:04 PM
- 876 Views
Re: Yes, that was it.
17/11/2010 02:55:58 AM
- 907 Views
Not at all.
17/11/2010 03:04:50 AM
- 877 Views
Well, that's a borderline lie
17/11/2010 04:29:47 AM
- 960 Views
How do you figure?
17/11/2010 05:46:37 AM
- 868 Views
I'd say its pretty pertinent to my defense
17/11/2010 06:49:20 AM
- 858 Views
All right, fair enough.
17/11/2010 07:19:37 AM
- 971 Views
Thanks for whakcing me before going to bed
17/11/2010 07:39:58 AM
- 877 Views

By the way, I'd appreciate if no one had hammer till FT has a chance to reply and vice-versa
17/11/2010 07:46:18 AM
- 870 Views
I have evidence in favor of and yet against F-T's claim. Take it as you will.
17/11/2010 07:18:35 PM
- 952 Views
Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:20:58 PM
- 951 Views
Re: Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:24:34 PM
- 841 Views
Uh, that doesn't make a lot of sense
17/11/2010 07:22:59 PM
- 919 Views
That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 07:26:34 PM
- 861 Views
Re: That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 08:01:20 PM
- 945 Views
Actually that sounds a good plan
17/11/2010 08:06:50 PM
- 854 Views
Glad to hear you agree with yourself
17/11/2010 08:14:42 PM
- 954 Views

:/ Wanna mention this before I forget. Little niggling that's been bugging me.
17/11/2010 03:03:27 AM
- 874 Views
Ah yes, I noticed that as well
17/11/2010 04:08:15 AM
- 876 Views
I just caught that
17/11/2010 04:53:16 AM
- 974 Views
No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:29:36 AM
- 899 Views
Re: No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:34:46 AM
- 911 Views
I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
17/11/2010 06:30:26 PM
- 955 Views
Re: I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
17/11/2010 07:09:14 PM
- 957 Views
Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:28:31 PM
- 972 Views
Re: Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:33:51 PM
- 849 Views
I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 05:38:53 AM
- 807 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:04:08 AM
- 831 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:25:05 AM
- 927 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:50:04 AM
- 856 Views
In the interests of honesty, now would probably be a good time to mention ...
17/11/2010 09:22:14 PM
- 885 Views
What the balls?
17/11/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 898 Views
I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 02:02:03 PM
- 856 Views
Re: I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 03:18:50 PM
- 830 Views
Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 05:16:28 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 06:00:06 PM
- 871 Views
I'd also like to point out that we know nothing about you
18/11/2010 03:37:08 PM
- 850 Views
i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:45:10 PM
- 887 Views
Re: i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:49:54 PM
- 808 Views
They're also Marvel characters
18/11/2010 06:30:11 PM
- 898 Views
LOL, duly noted
18/11/2010 06:48:08 PM
- 915 Views

Beast is really surprisingly un-beastly.
18/11/2010 06:28:15 PM
- 917 Views
Sure
18/11/2010 06:42:01 PM
- 900 Views
Alright, to hell with this. Let's test F-T's sanity. Vote: Isaac *NM*
21/11/2010 08:29:53 PM
- 534 Views
Ah, the frustration vote, normally my best friend
21/11/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 873 Views

OK, here's a question for beet:
21/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
- 876 Views
You're not suggesting we lynch F-T instead of Isaac, are you?
21/11/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 870 Views
But we do get information
22/11/2010 12:17:20 AM
- 889 Views
<-- Btw, first time I got the hammer vote. My life is now complete. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:20:53 AM
- 533 Views
Well, congrats
*NM*
22/11/2010 12:32:34 AM
- 554 Views

Since this is a first for both of us...
22/11/2010 12:35:29 AM
- 878 Views

When someone dies, you find out their role. "Psycho Cop" is a distinct role.
21/11/2010 11:22:50 PM
- 883 Views
Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:00:31 AM
- 838 Views
Re: Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:21:01 AM
- 946 Views
Isaac has been lynched!
22/11/2010 03:10:01 AM
- 782 Views
I can't help but feel a silver bullet would have been appropriate
22/11/2010 04:11:13 AM
- 772 Views

I find that astounding, considering the level of suspicion generally laid upon you *NM*
22/11/2010 04:16:04 AM
- 591 Views
I might just mount your head on my wall
.
22/11/2010 05:09:45 AM
- 963 Views

I consider myself an integral part in this group.
22/11/2010 05:27:12 AM
- 952 Views