Well, I'll give you that I only voted on Ranagrande because deadline was approaching.
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/11/2012 08:14:45 AM
I really didn't expect a scummer to go inactive like that, but more importantly, I was hoping we could get him as a modkill, which would have made him a bonus to someone else.
But it's true, I would totally have bussed Rana at that point, without the slightest hesitation.
We can be pretty much certain that Yuna is who she claims to be, and if we're ever searching for Serial Killers she'll be my top suspect again, but right now we don't even know that we have one of those, and the lack of night kill seems to imply that we don't. So as far as I'm concerned she is off-limits with regards to lynching.
Besides, her power probably makes her harder to lynch anyway.
Everything that applied to Taiga yesterday still applies today, but from the very little I've seen of the show, he roleclaimed pretty much exactly what I expected, and the claim is major enough that I don't expect it to be fake. Of course, Angel also has enough history that it could be a completely truthful roleclaim and still be scum.
But as of right now, I'm leaning against yesterday's top contenders. Next on the list was me, but obviously I'm not going to vote for myself
.
The problem with the voting record here is that I generally don't count voting for inactives as especially meaningful. It's an easy vote to make - the target doesn't defend himself, it's easy to self-justify because even if he does turn out not to be scum (which is usually the case) then he was still acting antitown by draining the town's voting capacity, and scum are really not going to hesitate much in trying to improve their image by dropping the dead weight.
Which brings me to my own favourite suspect: Isaac.
Not lynching new players (or Yunalesca again) is a sentiment I can understand, but from there to claiming that he "doesn't see the case on Yuna or Taiga" is quite a stretch. Both were significant deviations from the norm in ways that screamed scum so obviously that one of the major argument raised in both their defences was that this deviation made them so obviously scum that they would have been stupid not to lie about it if they were scum.
So that's pretty bizarre. And then he votes for Ranagrande post-hammer. Which probably means nothing, I'm pretty sure Isaac wouldn't have minded at all being the actual hammer, but he did vote late. Even though he claimed that he was inclined to vote against Ranagrande earlier than that. So I suspect that he was trying to ingratiate himself to Taiga and Yunalesca by defending them at the expense of someone he had no compunction against bussing anyway.
Vote: Isaac
But it's true, I would totally have bussed Rana at that point, without the slightest hesitation.
We can be pretty much certain that Yuna is who she claims to be, and if we're ever searching for Serial Killers she'll be my top suspect again, but right now we don't even know that we have one of those, and the lack of night kill seems to imply that we don't. So as far as I'm concerned she is off-limits with regards to lynching.
Besides, her power probably makes her harder to lynch anyway.
Everything that applied to Taiga yesterday still applies today, but from the very little I've seen of the show, he roleclaimed pretty much exactly what I expected, and the claim is major enough that I don't expect it to be fake. Of course, Angel also has enough history that it could be a completely truthful roleclaim and still be scum.
But as of right now, I'm leaning against yesterday's top contenders. Next on the list was me, but obviously I'm not going to vote for myself
.The problem with the voting record here is that I generally don't count voting for inactives as especially meaningful. It's an easy vote to make - the target doesn't defend himself, it's easy to self-justify because even if he does turn out not to be scum (which is usually the case) then he was still acting antitown by draining the town's voting capacity, and scum are really not going to hesitate much in trying to improve their image by dropping the dead weight.
Which brings me to my own favourite suspect: Isaac.
I'm not seeing the case on Yuna or Taiga and it would have to be medium strong to get me to vote for a new player on Day 1
Not lynching new players (or Yunalesca again) is a sentiment I can understand, but from there to claiming that he "doesn't see the case on Yuna or Taiga" is quite a stretch. Both were significant deviations from the norm in ways that screamed scum so obviously that one of the major argument raised in both their defences was that this deviation made them so obviously scum that they would have been stupid not to lie about it if they were scum.
So that's pretty bizarre. And then he votes for Ranagrande post-hammer. Which probably means nothing, I'm pretty sure Isaac wouldn't have minded at all being the actual hammer, but he did vote late. Even though he claimed that he was inclined to vote against Ranagrande earlier than that. So I suspect that he was trying to ingratiate himself to Taiga and Yunalesca by defending them at the expense of someone he had no compunction against bussing anyway.
Vote: Isaac
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Day 2: Superstar
- 28/10/2012 03:45:56 PM
2412 Views
Jonathan is precisely who Yunalesca claimed to be. *NM*
- 28/10/2012 08:24:47 PM
875 Views
EBWOP This was supposed to be a reply to Taiga's post, above. *NM*
- 28/10/2012 08:25:16 PM
942 Views
Re: Jonathan is precisely who Yunalesca claimed to be.
- 29/10/2012 10:04:52 AM
1535 Views
Re: Jonathan is precisely who Yunalesca claimed to be.
- 29/10/2012 05:35:31 PM
1479 Views
No, that's option 3 - I get that
- 29/10/2012 07:38:27 PM
1362 Views
I don't think that does work.
- 30/10/2012 02:34:34 AM
1641 Views
The Cairhien Game
- 30/10/2012 03:16:53 AM
1408 Views
Yeah, but in the Cairhien game, the Darkfriends were a sideshow
.
- 30/10/2012 04:05:02 AM
1269 Views
.
- 30/10/2012 04:05:02 AM
1269 Views
Interesting results
- 29/10/2012 02:52:26 AM
1403 Views
What now?
- 31/10/2012 07:39:04 AM
1390 Views
I think we should hear about Night Messages
- 31/10/2012 08:50:27 AM
1386 Views
You were targeted?
- 02/11/2012 12:15:13 AM
1367 Views
Hypocopping [TABLE] [Edit 2]
- 02/11/2012 04:12:42 PM
1517 Views
My understanding of the votes from Yesterday.
- 05/11/2012 12:16:56 PM
1636 Views
Well, if even this does not elicit a response in twelve+ hours...
- 06/11/2012 07:22:01 AM
1547 Views
Well, I'll give you that I only voted on Ranagrande because deadline was approaching.
- 06/11/2012 08:14:45 AM
1459 Views
Re: Well, I'll give you that I only voted on Ranagrande because deadline was approaching.
- 07/11/2012 07:43:45 AM
1596 Views
I just don't understand how you can consider these not to be strong enough cases.
- 07/11/2012 09:22:50 AM
1454 Views
I still haven't heard the case
- 08/11/2012 12:54:48 AM
1434 Views
Yuna's role
- 06/11/2012 10:16:36 AM
1422 Views
Most important question!
- 07/11/2012 01:34:54 PM
1349 Views
correction: it was a Night Resolution message *NM*
- 07/11/2012 11:16:38 PM
801 Views
So you are roled and had a Night Action? *NM*
- 08/11/2012 12:34:48 AM
907 Views
No, I was the target of a night action... *NM*
- 08/11/2012 07:52:35 AM
1002 Views
Strange. Targets of Night Actions wouldn't normally get a Resolution Message.
- 08/11/2012 03:57:57 PM
1564 Views
i guess due to Tagia biome's blunder i'd better role claim soon
- 07/11/2012 10:53:24 PM
1380 Views
you shouldn't necessarily claim because it's very plausible I misinterpreted the message *NM*
- 07/11/2012 11:22:32 PM
762 Views
Power! Internet! Bwaha!
- 09/11/2012 09:04:18 PM
1320 Views
No worries man.
- 09/11/2012 10:02:50 PM
1391 Views
Nothing too bad...
- 09/11/2012 10:22:43 PM
1293 Views
I'm working my way through the game now. Would you like a hyppocop? *NM*
- 09/11/2012 10:23:15 PM
878 Views
So now what? *NM*
- 11/11/2012 10:06:43 PM
758 Views
Can I ask for reasons...?
- 11/11/2012 10:08:11 PM
1478 Views
Either they investigated/tracked/whatever them and that's the result they got,
- 11/11/2012 10:19:05 PM
1446 Views
I feel like I have been advised in past games....
- 13/11/2012 01:43:10 AM
1294 Views
So some thoughts... also FOS: Taiga
- 13/11/2012 07:46:14 PM
1463 Views
I should point out...
- 14/11/2012 05:48:45 PM
1434 Views
Although that doesn't really change anything to your point
.
- 14/11/2012 05:49:45 PM
1450 Views
.
- 14/11/2012 05:49:45 PM
1450 Views
Re: Although that doesn't really change anything to your point
.
- 14/11/2012 09:38:53 PM
1405 Views
.
- 14/11/2012 09:38:53 PM
1405 Views
Hey, let's kill someone! *NM*
- 18/11/2012 12:52:34 AM
861 Views
Well, you already know my favourite
. *NM*
- 18/11/2012 03:13:53 AM
842 Views
. *NM*
- 18/11/2012 03:13:53 AM
842 Views
Someone else
*NM*
- 18/11/2012 03:37:26 AM
899 Views
*NM*
- 18/11/2012 03:37:26 AM
899 Views
Yeah, I'll probably do that.
- 18/11/2012 08:01:38 AM
1376 Views
That would seem to take us back to ? and Stephen, or some alternate plan
- 18/11/2012 10:24:16 AM
1354 Views
Re: That would seem to take us back to ? and Stephen, or some alternate plan
- 19/11/2012 06:11:18 PM
1249 Views
time to make a choice
- 19/11/2012 08:15:41 PM
1342 Views
Hardly anything to defend myself?
- 19/11/2012 08:41:32 PM
1321 Views
I concur.
- 20/11/2012 11:11:11 AM
1393 Views
Also, we still haven't got a decent explanation from Taiga.
- 20/11/2012 11:16:41 AM
1394 Views
Re: Also, we still haven't got a decent explanation from Taiga.
- 20/11/2012 01:44:15 PM
1328 Views
again
- 20/11/2012 06:23:22 PM
1332 Views
It's not entirely unusual to get messages when targeted by actions...
- 20/11/2012 06:57:14 PM
1300 Views
Vote: Yunalesca *NM*
- 20/11/2012 08:42:05 PM
1000 Views
Re: again
- 21/11/2012 12:49:49 AM
1435 Views
clarification
- 21/11/2012 05:10:41 PM
1359 Views
Well, yeah...
- 21/11/2012 06:21:23 PM
1276 Views
Umm...Idea.
- 22/11/2012 02:05:14 AM
1361 Views
That's not what it sounded like. *NM*
- 22/11/2012 01:12:46 AM
885 Views
I'm just throwing this out there.
- 18/11/2012 10:13:22 PM
1462 Views
Ooh... what an interesting idea.
- 19/11/2012 07:46:22 PM
1255 Views
Unless Rana was a SK, itr doens't change the dynamics of the NK, or lack thereof *NM*
- 20/11/2012 05:49:40 AM
828 Views
Yes, well that's what I was starting to wonder. Was Rana acting alone?
- 20/11/2012 07:18:37 AM
1338 Views
RBIRL
- 22/11/2012 10:40:44 PM
1381 Views
Find out who's doing the airship mod and tell him to hurry up *NM*
- 22/11/2012 11:03:48 PM
775 Views
Right... *NM*
- 25/11/2012 05:23:59 PM
820 Views
Left... *NM*
- 25/11/2012 09:37:20 PM
889 Views
Ah someone lives!
- 25/11/2012 09:58:03 PM
1340 Views
I do live too..
- 26/11/2012 09:14:02 AM
1335 Views
Unvote
- 26/11/2012 06:34:47 PM
1393 Views
But that'd make three scum...
- 26/11/2012 08:40:36 PM
1363 Views
Before we hammer here... can we get a RC from Stephen?
- 26/11/2012 11:10:57 PM
1617 Views
Sorry, I've been ill.
- 28/11/2012 02:46:20 PM
1381 Views
That's a bold claim.
- 29/11/2012 03:28:43 AM
1292 Views
Well, I have suspected Taiga from pretty much the first minute as I have previously documented.
- 29/11/2012 02:01:37 PM
1504 Views
Why would you Watch someone you suspected? You track them - Vote: Stephen
- 29/11/2012 06:13:20 PM
1499 Views
Vote: Stephen
- 30/11/2012 06:38:59 AM
1361 Views

*NM*
*NM*
^^ *NM*