Well, I'll give you that I only voted on Ranagrande because deadline was approaching.
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/11/2012 08:14:45 AM
I really didn't expect a scummer to go inactive like that, but more importantly, I was hoping we could get him as a modkill, which would have made him a bonus to someone else.
But it's true, I would totally have bussed Rana at that point, without the slightest hesitation.
We can be pretty much certain that Yuna is who she claims to be, and if we're ever searching for Serial Killers she'll be my top suspect again, but right now we don't even know that we have one of those, and the lack of night kill seems to imply that we don't. So as far as I'm concerned she is off-limits with regards to lynching.
Besides, her power probably makes her harder to lynch anyway.
Everything that applied to Taiga yesterday still applies today, but from the very little I've seen of the show, he roleclaimed pretty much exactly what I expected, and the claim is major enough that I don't expect it to be fake. Of course, Angel also has enough history that it could be a completely truthful roleclaim and still be scum.
But as of right now, I'm leaning against yesterday's top contenders. Next on the list was me, but obviously I'm not going to vote for myself
.
The problem with the voting record here is that I generally don't count voting for inactives as especially meaningful. It's an easy vote to make - the target doesn't defend himself, it's easy to self-justify because even if he does turn out not to be scum (which is usually the case) then he was still acting antitown by draining the town's voting capacity, and scum are really not going to hesitate much in trying to improve their image by dropping the dead weight.
Which brings me to my own favourite suspect: Isaac.
Not lynching new players (or Yunalesca again) is a sentiment I can understand, but from there to claiming that he "doesn't see the case on Yuna or Taiga" is quite a stretch. Both were significant deviations from the norm in ways that screamed scum so obviously that one of the major argument raised in both their defences was that this deviation made them so obviously scum that they would have been stupid not to lie about it if they were scum.
So that's pretty bizarre. And then he votes for Ranagrande post-hammer. Which probably means nothing, I'm pretty sure Isaac wouldn't have minded at all being the actual hammer, but he did vote late. Even though he claimed that he was inclined to vote against Ranagrande earlier than that. So I suspect that he was trying to ingratiate himself to Taiga and Yunalesca by defending them at the expense of someone he had no compunction against bussing anyway.
Vote: Isaac
But it's true, I would totally have bussed Rana at that point, without the slightest hesitation.
We can be pretty much certain that Yuna is who she claims to be, and if we're ever searching for Serial Killers she'll be my top suspect again, but right now we don't even know that we have one of those, and the lack of night kill seems to imply that we don't. So as far as I'm concerned she is off-limits with regards to lynching.
Besides, her power probably makes her harder to lynch anyway.
Everything that applied to Taiga yesterday still applies today, but from the very little I've seen of the show, he roleclaimed pretty much exactly what I expected, and the claim is major enough that I don't expect it to be fake. Of course, Angel also has enough history that it could be a completely truthful roleclaim and still be scum.
But as of right now, I'm leaning against yesterday's top contenders. Next on the list was me, but obviously I'm not going to vote for myself

The problem with the voting record here is that I generally don't count voting for inactives as especially meaningful. It's an easy vote to make - the target doesn't defend himself, it's easy to self-justify because even if he does turn out not to be scum (which is usually the case) then he was still acting antitown by draining the town's voting capacity, and scum are really not going to hesitate much in trying to improve their image by dropping the dead weight.
Which brings me to my own favourite suspect: Isaac.
I'm not seeing the case on Yuna or Taiga and it would have to be medium strong to get me to vote for a new player on Day 1
Not lynching new players (or Yunalesca again) is a sentiment I can understand, but from there to claiming that he "doesn't see the case on Yuna or Taiga" is quite a stretch. Both were significant deviations from the norm in ways that screamed scum so obviously that one of the major argument raised in both their defences was that this deviation made them so obviously scum that they would have been stupid not to lie about it if they were scum.
So that's pretty bizarre. And then he votes for Ranagrande post-hammer. Which probably means nothing, I'm pretty sure Isaac wouldn't have minded at all being the actual hammer, but he did vote late. Even though he claimed that he was inclined to vote against Ranagrande earlier than that. So I suspect that he was trying to ingratiate himself to Taiga and Yunalesca by defending them at the expense of someone he had no compunction against bussing anyway.
Vote: Isaac
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Day 2: Superstar
28/10/2012 03:45:56 PM
- 2104 Views
Jonathan is precisely who Yunalesca claimed to be. *NM*
28/10/2012 08:24:47 PM
- 701 Views
EBWOP This was supposed to be a reply to Taiga's post, above. *NM*
28/10/2012 08:25:16 PM
- 780 Views
Re: Jonathan is precisely who Yunalesca claimed to be.
29/10/2012 10:04:52 AM
- 1226 Views
Re: Jonathan is precisely who Yunalesca claimed to be.
29/10/2012 05:35:31 PM
- 1177 Views
No, that's option 3 - I get that
29/10/2012 07:38:27 PM
- 1070 Views
I don't think that does work.
30/10/2012 02:34:34 AM
- 1248 Views
The Cairhien Game
30/10/2012 03:16:53 AM
- 1098 Views
Yeah, but in the Cairhien game, the Darkfriends were a sideshow
.
30/10/2012 04:05:02 AM
- 981 Views

Interesting results
29/10/2012 02:52:26 AM
- 1083 Views
What now?
31/10/2012 07:39:04 AM
- 1110 Views
I think we should hear about Night Messages
31/10/2012 08:50:27 AM
- 1113 Views
You were targeted?
02/11/2012 12:15:13 AM
- 1057 Views
Hypocopping [TABLE] [Edit 2]
02/11/2012 04:12:42 PM
- 1190 Views
My understanding of the votes from Yesterday.
05/11/2012 12:16:56 PM
- 1294 Views
Well, if even this does not elicit a response in twelve+ hours...
06/11/2012 07:22:01 AM
- 1235 Views
Well, I'll give you that I only voted on Ranagrande because deadline was approaching.
06/11/2012 08:14:45 AM
- 1150 Views
Re: Well, I'll give you that I only voted on Ranagrande because deadline was approaching.
07/11/2012 07:43:45 AM
- 1298 Views
I just don't understand how you can consider these not to be strong enough cases.
07/11/2012 09:22:50 AM
- 1141 Views
I still haven't heard the case
08/11/2012 12:54:48 AM
- 1115 Views
Yuna's role
06/11/2012 10:16:36 AM
- 1136 Views
Most important question!
07/11/2012 01:34:54 PM
- 1059 Views
correction: it was a Night Resolution message *NM*
07/11/2012 11:16:38 PM
- 644 Views
So you are roled and had a Night Action? *NM*
08/11/2012 12:34:48 AM
- 760 Views
No, I was the target of a night action... *NM*
08/11/2012 07:52:35 AM
- 841 Views
Strange. Targets of Night Actions wouldn't normally get a Resolution Message.
08/11/2012 03:57:57 PM
- 1280 Views
i guess due to Tagia biome's blunder i'd better role claim soon
07/11/2012 10:53:24 PM
- 1107 Views
you shouldn't necessarily claim because it's very plausible I misinterpreted the message *NM*
07/11/2012 11:22:32 PM
- 621 Views
Power! Internet! Bwaha!
09/11/2012 09:04:18 PM
- 1037 Views
No worries man.
09/11/2012 10:02:50 PM
- 1078 Views
Nothing too bad...
09/11/2012 10:22:43 PM
- 997 Views
I'm working my way through the game now. Would you like a hyppocop? *NM*
09/11/2012 10:23:15 PM
- 729 Views
So now what? *NM*
11/11/2012 10:06:43 PM
- 607 Views
Can I ask for reasons...?
11/11/2012 10:08:11 PM
- 1168 Views
Either they investigated/tracked/whatever them and that's the result they got,
11/11/2012 10:19:05 PM
- 1144 Views
I feel like I have been advised in past games....
13/11/2012 01:43:10 AM
- 1014 Views
So some thoughts... also FOS: Taiga
13/11/2012 07:46:14 PM
- 1160 Views
I should point out...
14/11/2012 05:48:45 PM
- 1129 Views
Although that doesn't really change anything to your point
.
14/11/2012 05:49:45 PM
- 1174 Views

Re: Although that doesn't really change anything to your point
.
14/11/2012 09:38:53 PM
- 1128 Views

Hey, let's kill someone! *NM*
18/11/2012 12:52:34 AM
- 718 Views
Well, you already know my favourite
. *NM*
18/11/2012 03:13:53 AM
- 691 Views

Someone else
*NM*
18/11/2012 03:37:26 AM
- 727 Views

Yeah, I'll probably do that.
18/11/2012 08:01:38 AM
- 1050 Views
That would seem to take us back to ? and Stephen, or some alternate plan
18/11/2012 10:24:16 AM
- 1062 Views
Re: That would seem to take us back to ? and Stephen, or some alternate plan
19/11/2012 06:11:18 PM
- 958 Views
time to make a choice
19/11/2012 08:15:41 PM
- 1057 Views
Hardly anything to defend myself?
19/11/2012 08:41:32 PM
- 1023 Views
I concur.
20/11/2012 11:11:11 AM
- 1124 Views
Also, we still haven't got a decent explanation from Taiga.
20/11/2012 11:16:41 AM
- 1088 Views
Re: Also, we still haven't got a decent explanation from Taiga.
20/11/2012 01:44:15 PM
- 1037 Views
again
20/11/2012 06:23:22 PM
- 1070 Views
It's not entirely unusual to get messages when targeted by actions...
20/11/2012 06:57:14 PM
- 1010 Views
Vote: Yunalesca *NM*
20/11/2012 08:42:05 PM
- 843 Views
Re: again
21/11/2012 12:49:49 AM
- 1111 Views
clarification
21/11/2012 05:10:41 PM
- 1073 Views
Well, yeah...
21/11/2012 06:21:23 PM
- 995 Views
Umm...Idea.
22/11/2012 02:05:14 AM
- 1090 Views
That's not what it sounded like. *NM*
22/11/2012 01:12:46 AM
- 748 Views
I'm just throwing this out there.
18/11/2012 10:13:22 PM
- 1148 Views
Ooh... what an interesting idea.
19/11/2012 07:46:22 PM
- 969 Views
Unless Rana was a SK, itr doens't change the dynamics of the NK, or lack thereof *NM*
20/11/2012 05:49:40 AM
- 683 Views
Yes, well that's what I was starting to wonder. Was Rana acting alone?
20/11/2012 07:18:37 AM
- 1032 Views
RBIRL
22/11/2012 10:40:44 PM
- 1105 Views
Find out who's doing the airship mod and tell him to hurry up *NM*
22/11/2012 11:03:48 PM
- 622 Views
Right... *NM*
25/11/2012 05:23:59 PM
- 672 Views
Left... *NM*
25/11/2012 09:37:20 PM
- 743 Views
Ah someone lives!
25/11/2012 09:58:03 PM
- 1040 Views
I do live too..
26/11/2012 09:14:02 AM
- 1083 Views
Unvote
26/11/2012 06:34:47 PM
- 1077 Views
But that'd make three scum...
26/11/2012 08:40:36 PM
- 1050 Views
Before we hammer here... can we get a RC from Stephen?
26/11/2012 11:10:57 PM
- 1353 Views
Sorry, I've been ill.
28/11/2012 02:46:20 PM
- 1113 Views
That's a bold claim.
29/11/2012 03:28:43 AM
- 1005 Views
Well, I have suspected Taiga from pretty much the first minute as I have previously documented.
29/11/2012 02:01:37 PM
- 1194 Views
Why would you Watch someone you suspected? You track them - Vote: Stephen
29/11/2012 06:13:20 PM
- 1191 Views
Vote: Stephen
30/11/2012 06:38:59 AM
- 1069 Views