The Sith are stronger than individual Jedi, in general, for the simple reason that there can only be two Sith at a time whereas there are many Jedi (admittedly not so many anymore by the time of the original trilogy, but they could retrain and get more again).
That does not fit with the "bring balance to the force" prophecy. If that is to be correct, the balance is achieved by there being two Sith and two Jedi. If their relative strengths were that different, that prophecy would make no sense, as Anakin would (on the contrary) destroy the balance.
According to Lucas, the balance prophecy referred to Vader when he killed the Emperor. This destroyed the Sith and brought balance to the Force. It was misinterpreted by the Jedi though.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1407 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 994 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 568 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 949 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1177 Views


Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1203 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 963 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 1030 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 1027 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 964 Views
As I understand it, the prophecy didn't mean that
11/08/2010 06:08:20 PM
- 1080 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 568 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 677 Views

It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 1003 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 815 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 1011 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 931 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 591 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 411 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 542 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 907 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 935 Views

Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 968 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 481 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 608 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 967 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 820 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 881 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 854 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 877 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 1002 Views

Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 1087 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 918 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 913 Views