This may sound dumb, but I always figured that since there were only two people (or maybe just a few more) using the Dark Side through Sith teachings that somehow there was a greater store of power that was more easily accessible, as opposed to there being thousands of Jedi all drawing on the Light Side in the same way.
Yes I could buy this, if it's confirmed that this is how the Force works.
This kind of makes sense if you consider that:
1) In old republic times, there were thousands of Sith and Jedi who seemed rather equal... I know you mentioned the trailers but you have to admit that the Jedi hold their own in the trailers and the Sith usually seem to win because of better lightsaber fighting than force use.
1) In old republic times, there were thousands of Sith and Jedi who seemed rather equal... I know you mentioned the trailers but you have to admit that the Jedi hold their own in the trailers and the Sith usually seem to win because of better lightsaber fighting than force use.
Wasn't Qui-Gonn one of the best lightsaber duelists in the Jedi?
2) In the prequels, only the more advanced apprentice (Dooku) can use force lightening... it doesn't seem like Darth Maul has any advanced force powers and is just really handy with a lightsaber.
True, but Maul was a spectacular swordsman, which is already a challenge to the Jedi. It seems like Dooku could only manage lightning with one hand, and Yoda could easily deflect it whereas Sidious was on a whole other level that nearly overwhelmed Yoda.
3) In the original trilogy, when there are a lot less Jedi in the galaxy, Luke (a barely trained padawan) fights a full-blown Sith Lord for quite a while, though he eventually gets pwnd and loses a hand. He comes back better than ever just a few months later (and, notably, after the death of the last Jedi master) and is able to defeat Vader completely.
True, but to be fair, Luke has the genetics of the ultimate Jedi. His midichlorian count must be enormous.
4) If you consider that, in the movies, the Jedi pretty much apprentice anyone with Force talent whereas the Sith only apprentice (in most cases) Jedi knights/masters who have shown a remarkable ability with both the Force and lightsaber skills, then I figure it makes some kind of sense.
I think this may be the strongest point. On the other hand, the Jedi are subdivided into Master and Padawan... so a Jedi Master has to train his padawan as best as he can, not that different to Sidious/Maul.
I think the Sith are just more discriminate in their recruiting. They only take the best of the best as apprentices, and as such are usually able to outclass their Jedi opponents.
Yes, you may be right.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
- 11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
1608 Views
To make them a scary menace
- 11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
1145 Views
. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
683 Views
Precisely.
- 12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
1126 Views
*NM*
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1472 Views
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1472 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
- 11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
1394 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1114 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
- 11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
1217 Views
Mno
- 11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
1181 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
- 11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
1152 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
675 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
- 16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
786 Views
Fair enough
- 11/08/2010 06:12:33 PM
1291 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1114 Views
It makes sense
- 12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
1194 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
- 12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
965 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
- 13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
1167 Views
Not they don't Edited
- 11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
1092 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
702 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
511 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
647 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
- 11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
1070 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying. 
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1085 Views
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1085 Views
Nonsense
- 11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
1122 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
609 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
710 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
- 12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
1106 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
- 12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
981 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
- 12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
1031 Views
It doesn't matter.
- 12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
1004 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
- 13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
1035 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith. 
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1149 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1149 Views
Because they're more powerful
- 12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
1271 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
1088 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
1073 Views