This is a question I ask myself from time-to-time as I download TV shows and movies from various less than legal sources. The obvious answer is, "It's illegal because you're not buying the DVDs and that is screwing everyone involved in making said movie/TV show out of their fair share of the money that would be made." Or even, "It's copyright infringement pure and simple and that's what makes it illegal." Maybe I'm just trying to justify my actions, but I feel like neither of these really makes sense. Back in the days of using a VCR I would record a show on a video cassette and re-watch it many times. I would even let friends borrow the tapes and watch them if they enjoyed what I had recorded. How is that different from downloading torrents? I never bought the DVDs when I was watching TV this way. Therefore the companies responsible for the shows or movies never lost any money. Even today I can DVR an episode of TV and watch it weeks later. If I choose to I could hook a VCR up to my TV and use it to copy the DVRed program to a tape and lend that out to the four people in the world that still use their VCRs on a regular basis.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal?
- 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM
1654 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows
- 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM
1292 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows
- 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM
1373 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits.
- 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM
1236 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years.
- 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM
1109 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM*
- 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM
600 Views
How do you figure that?
- 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM
1195 Views
Re: How do you figure that?
- 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM
1658 Views
A lot of it's volume.
- 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM
1191 Views
Your argument lacks merit.
- 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM
1194 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really.
- 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM
1479 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort.
- 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM
1309 Views
Very interesting.
- 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM
1328 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland.
- 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM
1228 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot
- 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM
1136 Views
The case that decided information can't be stolen dates from 1987.
- 20/01/2011 09:35:31 AM
1923 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song
- 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM
1065 Views
Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems
- 19/01/2011 11:35:31 PM
1275 Views
Re: Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems *NM*
- 19/01/2011 11:37:56 PM
639 Views
Re: Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems
- 20/01/2011 12:49:55 AM
1484 Views

It won't get you very many points.