I guess I'll just give the others a pass, accept that Indiana Jones isn't for me, and move on to other classics that I haven't seen yet, and that hopefully I'll find more deserving. Though somehow I doubt too many will be from the '80s, true. 
I do love Breakfast Club, and some others from that decade I'm sure, but I can't think of many.
I do love Breakfast Club, and some others from that decade I'm sure, but I can't think of many. It might be a good idea to accept them for what you know they are, and try to relax and watch them. Now that you know that YOU wouldn't rate them above 8, it might be more fun to watch them w/o expectations. The first and the third are my faves, but they do really have to be accepted as romps - I agree completely with Jens about the "warm fuzzies."
This one might get some discussion going... we can hope. So I just watched Raiders of the Lost Ark.
- 07/10/2011 10:32:19 PM
676 Views
Harrison Ford?
- 07/10/2011 10:56:17 PM
497 Views
Obviously I was always going to miss out on the nostalgia factor. But even so.
- 07/10/2011 11:09:15 PM
434 Views
Probably the difference between being a great example of the genre and pioneering it. *NM*
- 08/10/2011 12:03:38 AM
158 Views
I love the Mummy, but one reason why you shouldn't compare the two movies
- 08/10/2011 02:52:04 AM
406 Views
I've noticed your difficulties with recognizing the important and great films of the 80s before
- 08/10/2011 03:19:37 PM
427 Views
- 08/10/2011 03:19:37 PM
427 Views
I knew you'd appreciate my post. 
- 08/10/2011 08:42:58 PM
486 Views
- 08/10/2011 08:42:58 PM
486 Views
Or
- 09/10/2011 05:47:38 PM
381 Views
Better writing? Better lead actor? *NM*
- 08/10/2011 05:34:12 PM
249 Views
The latter is debatable, actually. As for the former: yeah, right. *NM*
- 08/10/2011 08:36:49 PM
148 Views
*NM*
- 08/10/2011 08:36:49 PM
148 Views
It's just an illustration of how things can be more than the sum of their parts.
- 11/10/2011 01:38:36 AM
494 Views