Active Users:403 Time:17/09/2025 01:15:55 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I liked it. The Shrike Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM
... So, the master played a rather big role. Tennant's doctor was a bit wussy, but I suppose that is better than "invincible"... I really really get annoyed with Donna, her gramps is better, though. I don't know about the cactus people...

as for the megahumungous spoiler thing in the end and the narrator... I was a bit surprised, actually. I wonder how they will kill them all off. Looks to be an interesting episode the first with both the on screen stuff and this.

Anyone else's first impressions? I wanted to keep the OP relatively spoiler free, but feel free to spoil it if you want to.


No humans means no Davros. No Davros means no Daleks. No Daleks means no Time War. No Time War means that the Time Lords are still around. But, if humans return, is the timeline restored? Will this be a choice between saving the human race or keeping the Time Lords around? Good stuff.

I wish Romana would come back . . . I always thought that between the Doctor and Romana they could repopulate the Gallifreyan race.
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? jh - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 509 Views
I'm glad we got so much of The Master - John Sim is a pretty wonderful actor. (some slight spoilers) snoopcester - 27/12/2009 03:11:27 PM 403 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* Camilla - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 535 Views
A good first part *spoilers* Mark - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 444 Views
Ooooh. Camilla - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 390 Views
I liked it. The Shrike - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 364 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. Tom - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 487 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. Camilla - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 359 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean The Shrike - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 485 Views
Timelords are also humanoid Camilla - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 358 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. The Shrike - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 374 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. Camilla - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 385 Views
Unless explicitly stated, we assume the simplest explanation - one heart. And human(oid). The Shrike - 29/12/2009 08:11:06 PM 344 Views
I always thought it was more a function of the series' budget restrictions. Tom - 29/12/2009 03:26:37 PM 400 Views
No, that was Leela. Tom - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 461 Views
I knew it was one of them Camilla - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 333 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* Tom - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 188 Views
This is true Camilla - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 383 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. Michael - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 385 Views
Mnonono Camilla - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 373 Views
Ok inside the dome. Michael - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 365 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. Camilla - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 378 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. Tom - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 359 Views
No, I'm not. Tom - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 441 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. Michael - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 359 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. Michael - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 425 Views
Interesting idea Mark - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 457 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes