Active Users:630 Time:18/03/2026 11:57:58 PM
I liked it. The Shrike Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM
... So, the master played a rather big role. Tennant's doctor was a bit wussy, but I suppose that is better than "invincible"... I really really get annoyed with Donna, her gramps is better, though. I don't know about the cactus people...

as for the megahumungous spoiler thing in the end and the narrator... I was a bit surprised, actually. I wonder how they will kill them all off. Looks to be an interesting episode the first with both the on screen stuff and this.

Anyone else's first impressions? I wanted to keep the OP relatively spoiler free, but feel free to spoil it if you want to.


No humans means no Davros. No Davros means no Daleks. No Daleks means no Time War. No Time War means that the Time Lords are still around. But, if humans return, is the timeline restored? Will this be a choice between saving the human race or keeping the Time Lords around? Good stuff.

I wish Romana would come back . . . I always thought that between the Doctor and Romana they could repopulate the Gallifreyan race.
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 558 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 591 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 513 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 442 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 415 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 542 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 410 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 537 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 407 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 420 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 432 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 519 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 376 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 209 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 431 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 435 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 426 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 413 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 428 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 405 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 489 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 407 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 469 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 507 Views

Reply to Message