Active Users:1674 Time:24/12/2025 01:02:55 AM
It's just simplistic. Like a Disney movie, but no songs. What really bugs me is that the Company beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 08/01/2010 08:48:32 AM
It's not a particularly deep plot. It's freaking gorgeous, and that's about it.


Although, there's a throwaway line in the movie that really sums it up for me. It's when scientist lady is shrieking about how the planet is worth more than just the rocks in it. It's totally, completely true, and the fact that the Company is too stupid to realize that irritates me.

You have found a planet with 1)Sentient lifeforms 2)Flying mountains and 3)ORGANISMS WHICH NATURALLY TELEPATHICALLY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER. ANY of those three represents an unprecedented leap ahead in our understanding of science, and all the Company cares about is the rock underneath!?

Sociology, Psychology, Art, even Theology would all be radically altered by studying the Na'vi (Hey, these aliens act so similar to us in some ways. Is all sentient life similar? Do they all have a God?)

You've found massive rock formations that are lighter than air- so light that they can support entire ecosystems. INSANE. What? How?!

TELEPATHIC INTERFACE. Avatar is set not even 200 years in the future. Obviously there's been some advances in neurotechnology- that's what the Avatar program is, after all. But can the humans control their vehicles with their thoughts? Can they store memories in trees, and share them with each other? Do the humans have anything even remotely close to a semi-sentient PLANET?


Sheesh. And that's not even going to the whole "the cure for AIDS could be in the rainforest" arguments...
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Suspension of Disbelief with Politics - 05/01/2010 06:46:53 PM 1594 Views
Oh I hear ya! - 05/01/2010 08:35:38 PM 805 Views
I don't completely agree, but this is similar to everyone retroactively hating Tom Cruise's movies. - 05/01/2010 08:47:19 PM 841 Views
Which is just as silly, yes. *NM* - 05/01/2010 08:48:55 PM 384 Views
Who hates Top Gun? That movie R0X0RS! *NM* - 07/01/2010 06:19:48 AM 408 Views
You know, I never understood that - 07/01/2010 07:28:36 AM 743 Views
What?? Min Rep is fantastic! *NM* - 07/01/2010 08:19:30 AM 388 Views
*Stands on counter* I am the last Poet Bartender - 07/01/2010 02:08:56 PM 766 Views
LOL...~hands Dannymac a clue~ - 06/01/2010 04:51:43 AM 952 Views
Just judging him based on what he writes... - 06/01/2010 04:17:49 PM 790 Views
the point is... - 06/01/2010 11:25:46 PM 755 Views
talk about needing a clue - 09/01/2010 06:01:14 PM 716 Views
Wait...I support same-sex marriage. Just not all that other crap. - 07/01/2010 06:18:40 AM 743 Views
trespasses against persons is subjective. - 07/01/2010 07:09:22 AM 812 Views
Actually, it isn't. - 07/01/2010 03:46:30 PM 710 Views
ah I wasn't aware you were referring to a legal term - 07/01/2010 05:37:10 PM 771 Views
Considering that it's made-up BS, why should it be? - 09/01/2010 11:01:31 PM 741 Views
what about those not capable of walking away? - 10/01/2010 03:51:10 AM 674 Views
Who has the right to say a parent is abusing the child, and what prevents abuses the other way? - 10/01/2010 09:13:45 AM 922 Views
You are not wrong - 10/01/2010 04:43:55 PM 748 Views
Re: trespasses against persons is subjective. - 09/01/2010 11:12:57 PM 760 Views
but it is wrong to deny the legal ramifications of marriage - 10/01/2010 04:19:02 AM 862 Views
Civics & economics 101 - 10/01/2010 08:47:07 AM 865 Views
okay, I can agree on your points - 10/01/2010 05:14:32 PM 676 Views
That's not Economics 101. That's practically Anarcho-capitalism. - 13/01/2010 11:54:22 PM 711 Views
Duh. - 14/01/2010 03:00:56 AM 708 Views
The existence of that right isn't what I'm arguing. - 18/01/2010 09:01:07 AM 698 Views
Re: The existence of that right isn't what I'm arguing. - 18/01/2010 11:57:33 AM 1010 Views
Apaprently I misread your earlier post. Very good points. *NM* - 19/01/2010 01:17:01 AM 363 Views
I'll agree to the trespass against persons - 09/01/2010 06:07:29 PM 766 Views
What bullshit you write. - 10/01/2010 01:30:02 AM 682 Views
uhm...nothing in nature shares with all. - 10/01/2010 05:28:04 AM 734 Views
So what you're saying is people shouldn't take movies to heart ? - 06/01/2010 01:39:21 PM 768 Views
That's just the point. - 06/01/2010 04:15:48 PM 861 Views
Precisely *NM* - 06/01/2010 04:45:58 PM 398 Views
indeed. they are not "soldiers" - 07/01/2010 07:12:32 AM 750 Views
that's a weasel script - 07/01/2010 09:55:13 AM 726 Views
well, it seems like it was less "lazy script writing" - 07/01/2010 05:38:35 PM 724 Views
huh. Well, my hunch would be - 07/01/2010 10:34:35 PM 831 Views
what makes them "look like military"?? - 09/01/2010 06:15:24 PM 795 Views
arguing the natives as terrorists would be a stretch *NM* - 09/01/2010 10:39:13 PM 380 Views
guessing you've seen it by now - 10/01/2010 12:48:57 PM 671 Views
AMEN *NM* - 09/01/2010 06:09:27 PM 363 Views
if the foo shits, wear it *NM* - 09/01/2010 06:08:11 PM 409 Views
I completely disagree with you about Avatar. - 06/01/2010 02:18:22 PM 822 Views
would you have felt better if they were albino aliens? - 07/01/2010 07:16:20 AM 734 Views
It's just simplistic. Like a Disney movie, but no songs. What really bugs me is that the Company - 08/01/2010 08:48:32 AM 803 Views
Yeah, I liked The Neverending Story better. - 08/01/2010 01:41:37 PM 735 Views
You know what it is for me... - 06/01/2010 07:37:10 PM 831 Views
That's understandable - 07/01/2010 07:25:23 AM 713 Views
That's totally what it is, hah - 08/01/2010 08:57:10 AM 842 Views
See...that's where I'm different. - 08/01/2010 03:33:30 PM 716 Views
I suppose the lesson is to not read about celebrities' politics? - 08/01/2010 06:22:10 PM 612 Views
But that's kind of the point... - 08/01/2010 06:51:05 PM 739 Views
Uh oh, you used the "c" word... - 08/01/2010 07:47:40 PM 828 Views
I hate it when you sound like an actual preacher - 08/01/2010 10:03:28 PM 729 Views
Aw, I liked some of those sentences. - 08/01/2010 11:07:15 PM 668 Views
Isn't that a Bible quote? *NM* - 09/01/2010 12:33:51 AM 383 Views
I guess maybe from an epistle? *NM* - 09/01/2010 02:44:36 AM 359 Views
Yup, Romans 8:31 - 09/01/2010 11:36:46 PM 646 Views
it's not that it was bad - 09/01/2010 01:01:21 AM 790 Views
That seems like a pretty dangerous philosophy. - 09/01/2010 06:24:35 AM 812 Views
Agreed. It also sounds absurd. I have +2 Armor of Christ. How about you? *NM* - 10/01/2010 06:42:24 PM 367 Views
he he *NM* - 11/01/2010 12:20:26 AM 335 Views
Maybe a little. - 11/01/2010 06:06:24 AM 829 Views
I like your philosophy. Thanks for sharing! *NM* - 11/01/2010 03:08:09 PM 331 Views
Ok, so apart from political subtexts, - 07/01/2010 05:40:28 AM 802 Views
You have to admire the world building though - 07/01/2010 07:27:13 AM 657 Views
Both of you are more or less right - 08/01/2010 08:59:34 AM 675 Views
He DID write the original screenplay, I thought? - 08/01/2010 10:04:07 PM 695 Views
And why is it that anyone who can <spoilers!> - 08/01/2010 09:03:45 AM 940 Views
Exactly! *Same spoilers ^he^ had. - 08/01/2010 04:59:16 PM 757 Views
You're looking at it from the outsider point of view - 08/01/2010 10:12:15 PM 716 Views
I don't buy it. - 09/01/2010 06:29:07 AM 746 Views
Especially with the warrior tribe mentality they all have! - 10/01/2010 08:25:57 PM 610 Views
if there were all these hotshot warriors trying - 11/01/2010 12:22:19 AM 691 Views
Poor scriptwriting *NM* - 11/01/2010 12:56:24 AM 360 Views
oh come on - 11/01/2010 01:00:40 AM 759 Views
Gher's right. It's Plot convinience, with a capital P *NM* - 13/01/2010 09:42:07 PM 345 Views
Re: Exactly! *Same spoilers ^he^ had. - 09/01/2010 01:27:59 PM 908 Views
It's pretty easy to conquer one of those things - 10/01/2010 08:27:20 PM 906 Views
Re: It's pretty easy to conquer one of those things - 10/01/2010 08:56:38 PM 668 Views
seriously - 11/01/2010 12:23:58 AM 639 Views

Reply to Message