Active Users:539 Time:19/03/2026 01:52:44 AM
It's just simplistic. Like a Disney movie, but no songs. What really bugs me is that the Company beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 08/01/2010 08:48:32 AM
It's not a particularly deep plot. It's freaking gorgeous, and that's about it.


Although, there's a throwaway line in the movie that really sums it up for me. It's when scientist lady is shrieking about how the planet is worth more than just the rocks in it. It's totally, completely true, and the fact that the Company is too stupid to realize that irritates me.

You have found a planet with 1)Sentient lifeforms 2)Flying mountains and 3)ORGANISMS WHICH NATURALLY TELEPATHICALLY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER. ANY of those three represents an unprecedented leap ahead in our understanding of science, and all the Company cares about is the rock underneath!?

Sociology, Psychology, Art, even Theology would all be radically altered by studying the Na'vi (Hey, these aliens act so similar to us in some ways. Is all sentient life similar? Do they all have a God?)

You've found massive rock formations that are lighter than air- so light that they can support entire ecosystems. INSANE. What? How?!

TELEPATHIC INTERFACE. Avatar is set not even 200 years in the future. Obviously there's been some advances in neurotechnology- that's what the Avatar program is, after all. But can the humans control their vehicles with their thoughts? Can they store memories in trees, and share them with each other? Do the humans have anything even remotely close to a semi-sentient PLANET?


Sheesh. And that's not even going to the whole "the cure for AIDS could be in the rainforest" arguments...
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Suspension of Disbelief with Politics - 05/01/2010 06:46:53 PM 1626 Views
Oh I hear ya! - 05/01/2010 08:35:38 PM 841 Views
I don't completely agree, but this is similar to everyone retroactively hating Tom Cruise's movies. - 05/01/2010 08:47:19 PM 877 Views
Which is just as silly, yes. *NM* - 05/01/2010 08:48:55 PM 396 Views
Who hates Top Gun? That movie R0X0RS! *NM* - 07/01/2010 06:19:48 AM 423 Views
You know, I never understood that - 07/01/2010 07:28:36 AM 781 Views
What?? Min Rep is fantastic! *NM* - 07/01/2010 08:19:30 AM 401 Views
*Stands on counter* I am the last Poet Bartender - 07/01/2010 02:08:56 PM 804 Views
LOL...~hands Dannymac a clue~ - 06/01/2010 04:51:43 AM 993 Views
Just judging him based on what he writes... - 06/01/2010 04:17:49 PM 818 Views
the point is... - 06/01/2010 11:25:46 PM 785 Views
talk about needing a clue - 09/01/2010 06:01:14 PM 750 Views
Wait...I support same-sex marriage. Just not all that other crap. - 07/01/2010 06:18:40 AM 776 Views
trespasses against persons is subjective. - 07/01/2010 07:09:22 AM 844 Views
Actually, it isn't. - 07/01/2010 03:46:30 PM 747 Views
ah I wasn't aware you were referring to a legal term - 07/01/2010 05:37:10 PM 805 Views
Considering that it's made-up BS, why should it be? - 09/01/2010 11:01:31 PM 774 Views
what about those not capable of walking away? - 10/01/2010 03:51:10 AM 714 Views
Who has the right to say a parent is abusing the child, and what prevents abuses the other way? - 10/01/2010 09:13:45 AM 965 Views
You are not wrong - 10/01/2010 04:43:55 PM 782 Views
Re: trespasses against persons is subjective. - 09/01/2010 11:12:57 PM 791 Views
but it is wrong to deny the legal ramifications of marriage - 10/01/2010 04:19:02 AM 899 Views
Civics & economics 101 - 10/01/2010 08:47:07 AM 902 Views
okay, I can agree on your points - 10/01/2010 05:14:32 PM 715 Views
That's not Economics 101. That's practically Anarcho-capitalism. - 13/01/2010 11:54:22 PM 748 Views
Duh. - 14/01/2010 03:00:56 AM 745 Views
The existence of that right isn't what I'm arguing. - 18/01/2010 09:01:07 AM 734 Views
Re: The existence of that right isn't what I'm arguing. - 18/01/2010 11:57:33 AM 1049 Views
Apaprently I misread your earlier post. Very good points. *NM* - 19/01/2010 01:17:01 AM 377 Views
I'll agree to the trespass against persons - 09/01/2010 06:07:29 PM 803 Views
What bullshit you write. - 10/01/2010 01:30:02 AM 715 Views
uhm...nothing in nature shares with all. - 10/01/2010 05:28:04 AM 770 Views
So what you're saying is people shouldn't take movies to heart ? - 06/01/2010 01:39:21 PM 800 Views
That's just the point. - 06/01/2010 04:15:48 PM 891 Views
Precisely *NM* - 06/01/2010 04:45:58 PM 413 Views
indeed. they are not "soldiers" - 07/01/2010 07:12:32 AM 781 Views
that's a weasel script - 07/01/2010 09:55:13 AM 757 Views
well, it seems like it was less "lazy script writing" - 07/01/2010 05:38:35 PM 764 Views
huh. Well, my hunch would be - 07/01/2010 10:34:35 PM 872 Views
what makes them "look like military"?? - 09/01/2010 06:15:24 PM 831 Views
arguing the natives as terrorists would be a stretch *NM* - 09/01/2010 10:39:13 PM 391 Views
guessing you've seen it by now - 10/01/2010 12:48:57 PM 702 Views
AMEN *NM* - 09/01/2010 06:09:27 PM 374 Views
if the foo shits, wear it *NM* - 09/01/2010 06:08:11 PM 424 Views
I completely disagree with you about Avatar. - 06/01/2010 02:18:22 PM 858 Views
would you have felt better if they were albino aliens? - 07/01/2010 07:16:20 AM 770 Views
It's just simplistic. Like a Disney movie, but no songs. What really bugs me is that the Company - 08/01/2010 08:48:32 AM 836 Views
Yeah, I liked The Neverending Story better. - 08/01/2010 01:41:37 PM 770 Views
You know what it is for me... - 06/01/2010 07:37:10 PM 861 Views
That's understandable - 07/01/2010 07:25:23 AM 756 Views
That's totally what it is, hah - 08/01/2010 08:57:10 AM 881 Views
See...that's where I'm different. - 08/01/2010 03:33:30 PM 746 Views
I suppose the lesson is to not read about celebrities' politics? - 08/01/2010 06:22:10 PM 651 Views
But that's kind of the point... - 08/01/2010 06:51:05 PM 768 Views
Uh oh, you used the "c" word... - 08/01/2010 07:47:40 PM 864 Views
I hate it when you sound like an actual preacher - 08/01/2010 10:03:28 PM 760 Views
Aw, I liked some of those sentences. - 08/01/2010 11:07:15 PM 703 Views
Isn't that a Bible quote? *NM* - 09/01/2010 12:33:51 AM 395 Views
I guess maybe from an epistle? *NM* - 09/01/2010 02:44:36 AM 373 Views
Yup, Romans 8:31 - 09/01/2010 11:36:46 PM 680 Views
it's not that it was bad - 09/01/2010 01:01:21 AM 821 Views
That seems like a pretty dangerous philosophy. - 09/01/2010 06:24:35 AM 845 Views
Agreed. It also sounds absurd. I have +2 Armor of Christ. How about you? *NM* - 10/01/2010 06:42:24 PM 377 Views
he he *NM* - 11/01/2010 12:20:26 AM 355 Views
Maybe a little. - 11/01/2010 06:06:24 AM 865 Views
I like your philosophy. Thanks for sharing! *NM* - 11/01/2010 03:08:09 PM 343 Views
Ok, so apart from political subtexts, - 07/01/2010 05:40:28 AM 830 Views
You have to admire the world building though - 07/01/2010 07:27:13 AM 694 Views
Both of you are more or less right - 08/01/2010 08:59:34 AM 711 Views
He DID write the original screenplay, I thought? - 08/01/2010 10:04:07 PM 731 Views
And why is it that anyone who can <spoilers!> - 08/01/2010 09:03:45 AM 974 Views
Exactly! *Same spoilers ^he^ had. - 08/01/2010 04:59:16 PM 787 Views
You're looking at it from the outsider point of view - 08/01/2010 10:12:15 PM 752 Views
I don't buy it. - 09/01/2010 06:29:07 AM 778 Views
Especially with the warrior tribe mentality they all have! - 10/01/2010 08:25:57 PM 647 Views
if there were all these hotshot warriors trying - 11/01/2010 12:22:19 AM 721 Views
Poor scriptwriting *NM* - 11/01/2010 12:56:24 AM 374 Views
oh come on - 11/01/2010 01:00:40 AM 795 Views
Gher's right. It's Plot convinience, with a capital P *NM* - 13/01/2010 09:42:07 PM 357 Views
Re: Exactly! *Same spoilers ^he^ had. - 09/01/2010 01:27:59 PM 937 Views
It's pretty easy to conquer one of those things - 10/01/2010 08:27:20 PM 939 Views
Re: It's pretty easy to conquer one of those things - 10/01/2010 08:56:38 PM 710 Views
seriously - 11/01/2010 12:23:58 AM 668 Views

Reply to Message