Active Users:397 Time:07/04/2026 10:02:52 PM
Oh, it makes perfect sense. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM

The voiceover really is annoying, no doubt about that, and most of the crap he says is inane filler anyways, so you really aren't missing a whole lot. Some people feel like without it the movie is hard to understand in parts....I can't really say, because I originally saw it w/the voiceover, so seeing it without isn't confusing.

Did that make any sense?? I feel like I was talking gibberish there.


Apparently the voice-over was added after the movie ran over budget and one of the funding companies acquired creative control - they felt it was too hard to understand otherwise, and needed to explain to the viewers what was going on. So I imagine my comments elsewhere about how this movie is remarkable for its refusal to take the viewer by the hand are much less relevant for the original theatrical cut, and the theatrical cut was likely more accessible and hence commercially viable.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1130 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 659 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 312 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 661 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 745 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 841 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 650 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 710 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 696 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 623 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 704 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 724 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 695 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 689 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 1009 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 853 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 634 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 644 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 876 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 660 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 311 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 607 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 624 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 601 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 666 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 803 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 663 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 666 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 664 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 618 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 751 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 813 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 598 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 641 Views
Quick question....did you see the final cut, or one of the original cuts w/the voiceover? - 25/03/2010 10:19:26 PM 587 Views
Final cut (and in a cinema - that didn't hurt with some of the shots, let me tell you) - 25/03/2010 10:25:29 PM 605 Views
I wish I could see it in a theater....one of these days I'm going to find it in a local theater - 25/03/2010 10:49:14 PM 654 Views
Oh, it makes perfect sense. - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM 595 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 578 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 352 Views

Reply to Message