Active Users:2357 Time:03/08/2026 06:22:33 AM
Oh, it makes perfect sense. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM

The voiceover really is annoying, no doubt about that, and most of the crap he says is inane filler anyways, so you really aren't missing a whole lot. Some people feel like without it the movie is hard to understand in parts....I can't really say, because I originally saw it w/the voiceover, so seeing it without isn't confusing.

Did that make any sense?? I feel like I was talking gibberish there.


Apparently the voice-over was added after the movie ran over budget and one of the funding companies acquired creative control - they felt it was too hard to understand otherwise, and needed to explain to the viewers what was going on. So I imagine my comments elsewhere about how this movie is remarkable for its refusal to take the viewer by the hand are much less relevant for the original theatrical cut, and the theatrical cut was likely more accessible and hence commercially viable.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1178 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 710 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 339 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 706 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 793 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 890 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 695 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 759 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 737 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 672 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 756 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 772 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 741 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 743 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 1059 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 907 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 685 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 696 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 921 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 710 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 335 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 656 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 669 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 647 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 715 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 863 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 713 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 717 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 718 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 662 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 801 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 864 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 644 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 691 Views
Quick question....did you see the final cut, or one of the original cuts w/the voiceover? - 25/03/2010 10:19:26 PM 637 Views
Final cut (and in a cinema - that didn't hurt with some of the shots, let me tell you) - 25/03/2010 10:25:29 PM 658 Views
I wish I could see it in a theater....one of these days I'm going to find it in a local theater - 25/03/2010 10:49:14 PM 710 Views
Oh, it makes perfect sense. - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM 645 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 627 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 377 Views

Reply to Message