Active Users:483 Time:02/05/2025 05:58:19 PM
Oh, it makes perfect sense. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM

The voiceover really is annoying, no doubt about that, and most of the crap he says is inane filler anyways, so you really aren't missing a whole lot. Some people feel like without it the movie is hard to understand in parts....I can't really say, because I originally saw it w/the voiceover, so seeing it without isn't confusing.

Did that make any sense?? I feel like I was talking gibberish there.


Apparently the voice-over was added after the movie ran over budget and one of the funding companies acquired creative control - they felt it was too hard to understand otherwise, and needed to explain to the viewers what was going on. So I imagine my comments elsewhere about how this movie is remarkable for its refusal to take the viewer by the hand are much less relevant for the original theatrical cut, and the theatrical cut was likely more accessible and hence commercially viable.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 995 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 540 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 262 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 527 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 604 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 696 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 521 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 591 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 584 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 486 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 543 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 599 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 540 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 563 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 856 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 736 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 494 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 525 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 735 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 548 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 256 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 483 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 495 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 473 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 526 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 657 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 531 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 531 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 536 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 491 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 601 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 677 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 466 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 507 Views
Quick question....did you see the final cut, or one of the original cuts w/the voiceover? - 25/03/2010 10:19:26 PM 472 Views
Final cut (and in a cinema - that didn't hurt with some of the shots, let me tell you) - 25/03/2010 10:25:29 PM 487 Views
I wish I could see it in a theater....one of these days I'm going to find it in a local theater - 25/03/2010 10:49:14 PM 534 Views
Oh, it makes perfect sense. - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM 476 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 453 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 284 Views

Reply to Message