Active Users:653 Time:18/09/2026 04:12:46 PM
Oh, it makes perfect sense. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM

The voiceover really is annoying, no doubt about that, and most of the crap he says is inane filler anyways, so you really aren't missing a whole lot. Some people feel like without it the movie is hard to understand in parts....I can't really say, because I originally saw it w/the voiceover, so seeing it without isn't confusing.

Did that make any sense?? I feel like I was talking gibberish there.


Apparently the voice-over was added after the movie ran over budget and one of the funding companies acquired creative control - they felt it was too hard to understand otherwise, and needed to explain to the viewers what was going on. So I imagine my comments elsewhere about how this movie is remarkable for its refusal to take the viewer by the hand are much less relevant for the original theatrical cut, and the theatrical cut was likely more accessible and hence commercially viable.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1193 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 731 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 350 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 723 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 816 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 902 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 710 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 784 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 761 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 694 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 771 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 793 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 762 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 756 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 1077 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 921 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 708 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 717 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 940 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 729 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 351 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 677 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 685 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 662 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 729 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 878 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 738 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 735 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 734 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 687 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 819 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 879 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 662 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 714 Views
Quick question....did you see the final cut, or one of the original cuts w/the voiceover? - 25/03/2010 10:19:26 PM 656 Views
Final cut (and in a cinema - that didn't hurt with some of the shots, let me tell you) - 25/03/2010 10:25:29 PM 679 Views
I wish I could see it in a theater....one of these days I'm going to find it in a local theater - 25/03/2010 10:49:14 PM 724 Views
Oh, it makes perfect sense. - 25/03/2010 11:10:34 PM 661 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 652 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 386 Views

Reply to Message