Active Users:618 Time:31/10/2026 03:20:23 AM
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM
It may be logical for humans with a limited lifespan, but for a being with the ability to be everywhere at once, exist at all times at once and etc., finding the "Beginning" is not so simple. That's the whole point of the Ouroboros spiral - there is no start and there is no end; the conceptions are one and the same to such a being.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1755 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1323 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 1042 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1184 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1191 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 1104 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 1030 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 492 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 1016 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 1084 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 1078 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 986 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1168 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 1067 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 1011 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 1041 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 1028 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 1043 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 1127 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 1030 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 1048 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 527 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 1017 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 556 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 571 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 1107 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 987 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 1044 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1353 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 1058 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1158 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1550 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 1094 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 1043 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 1089 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1160 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1148 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 1081 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 1000 Views

Reply to Message