Active Users:470 Time:03/05/2025 07:57:34 AM
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM
It may be logical for humans with a limited lifespan, but for a being with the ability to be everywhere at once, exist at all times at once and etc., finding the "Beginning" is not so simple. That's the whole point of the Ouroboros spiral - there is no start and there is no end; the conceptions are one and the same to such a being.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1363 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 968 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 738 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 853 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 818 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 782 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 713 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 343 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 687 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 738 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 769 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 696 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 861 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 744 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 686 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 726 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 717 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 708 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 778 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 717 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 729 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 370 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 686 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 340 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 397 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 760 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 668 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 699 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1013 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 713 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 817 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1144 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 736 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 734 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 778 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 849 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 787 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 739 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 685 Views

Reply to Message