I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
But I don't really care. Asmodean is toast, and I don't think it makes a difference who did it.
And I put Moghedien in there just for the fun of it.
And I put Moghedien in there just for the fun of it.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 26/05/2010 at 02:07:07 PM
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1403 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1030 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1036 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1002 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
799 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
881 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
851 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
825 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
888 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
878 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
805 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
748 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
382 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
787 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
343 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
816 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
354 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
754 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
808 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
769 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
711 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
820 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
715 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
728 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
898 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
895 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
394 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
965 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
820 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
813 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
810 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
827 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
764 Views