IMO, it also doesn't seem to make much sense that the especially careful Graendal would stroll through the basement of the mostly empty Caemlyn palace - with no servants there - without any disguise, but of course balefire prepared (though for some reason not inverted), since the possibility remained that instead of Asmo, e.g. Rand had opened the door to see her (and we know that the last Graendal wants is to confront Rand in his territory).
Besides that, Moiraine apparently used very weak balefire, but it was obviously still strong enough to prevent a transmigration of Be'lal. A Forsaken like Graendal should per se use stronger balefire, especially if she might confront her arch-enemy or a Forsaken rival, precisely to exclude that the DO might perform a transmigration. And if her balefire was nevertheless just minimal, the DO could transmigrate Asmo everywhere, according to RJ's words on balefire.
To explain the how- and where-factors with balefire would mean that RJ basically said that - by chance - balefire in such an amount was used that, if Graendal had theoretically killed Asmo at SG, the DO still could have transmigrated him. This "not at SG-location" doesn't really fit a concrete and sensible where-factor, because SG was anyway never in question to be the location of Asmo's murder.
Besides that, Moiraine apparently used very weak balefire, but it was obviously still strong enough to prevent a transmigration of Be'lal. A Forsaken like Graendal should per se use stronger balefire, especially if she might confront her arch-enemy or a Forsaken rival, precisely to exclude that the DO might perform a transmigration. And if her balefire was nevertheless just minimal, the DO could transmigrate Asmo everywhere, according to RJ's words on balefire.
To explain the how- and where-factors with balefire would mean that RJ basically said that - by chance - balefire in such an amount was used that, if Graendal had theoretically killed Asmo at SG, the DO still could have transmigrated him. This "not at SG-location" doesn't really fit a concrete and sensible where-factor, because SG was anyway never in question to be the location of Asmo's murder.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1373 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1011 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1010 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
972 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
770 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
856 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
826 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
806 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
859 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
852 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
781 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
724 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
374 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
764 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
335 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
790 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
343 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
730 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
795 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
749 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
689 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
795 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
690 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
705 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
872 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
874 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
387 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
942 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
789 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
792 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
784 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
798 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
739 Views
