The wording fits pretty well with my interpretation that Asmo was mortally wounded by a poisoned bolt he took, and then Slayer took him to TAR where Asmo gave this last breath.
And it would explain RJ's how and where factors on why the DO can't bring Asmo back.
And it would explain RJ's how and where factors on why the DO can't bring Asmo back.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1240 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
909 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
871 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
862 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
655 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
730 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
722 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
703 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
772 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
770 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
690 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
631 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
325 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
654 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
292 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
681 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
303 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
644 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
696 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
667 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
609 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
676 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
599 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
614 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
779 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
758 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
332 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
808 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
694 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
700 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
692 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
699 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
643 Views