The wording fits pretty well with my interpretation that Asmo was mortally wounded by a poisoned bolt he took, and then Slayer took him to TAR where Asmo gave this last breath.
And it would explain RJ's how and where factors on why the DO can't bring Asmo back.
And it would explain RJ's how and where factors on why the DO can't bring Asmo back.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1371 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1011 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1009 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
971 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
769 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
854 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
825 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
805 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
858 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
851 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
780 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
724 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
374 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
763 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
335 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
788 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
343 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
728 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
794 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
748 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
689 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
792 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
689 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
704 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
871 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
873 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
387 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
941 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
788 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
791 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
783 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
796 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
738 Views