Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
But we didn't know about the TP for a long time after Ishy's death. All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?
But of course we had clues concerning the TP before LoC, even if it wasn't named yet.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1451 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1066 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1078 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1039 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
840 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
922 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
885 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
862 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
938 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
918 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
840 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
794 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
398 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
821 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
360 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
860 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
371 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
789 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
846 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
814 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
753 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
860 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
749 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
765 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
942 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
935 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
415 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1005 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
859 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
853 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
851 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
873 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
808 Views