RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1454 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1069 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1080 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1041 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
843 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
926 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
887 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
864 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
940 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
920 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
844 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
796 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
398 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
824 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
360 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
862 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
371 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
792 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
848 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
815 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
754 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
862 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
753 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
767 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
944 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
938 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
415 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1008 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
861 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
855 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
853 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
876 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
810 Views