RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1542 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1147 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1159 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1123 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
912 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
999 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
963 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
944 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
1016 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
985 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
906 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
875 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
434 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
893 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
395 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
931 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
407 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
853 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
918 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
880 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
822 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
939 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
838 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
853 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
1035 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
1026 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
449 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1089 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
926 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
925 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
931 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
952 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
876 Views
Re: I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:24:44 PM
1003 Views