RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1476 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1090 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1097 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1060 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
859 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
942 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
911 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
885 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
959 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
936 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
860 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
819 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
409 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
843 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
369 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
882 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
381 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
807 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
868 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
829 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
771 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
880 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
771 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
794 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
967 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
965 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
422 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1032 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
881 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
873 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
875 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
895 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
829 Views