Active Users:644 Time:22/03/2026 04:01:32 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1474 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 944 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 965 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 877 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 900 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 958 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 915 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 869 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 836 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 935 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1092 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 881 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 881 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 809 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 892 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 818 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 788 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 863 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1037 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 878 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 861 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 882 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 857 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 829 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1371 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 908 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 856 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 839 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 858 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 793 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 926 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 868 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 809 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 806 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 788 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 893 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 950 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 910 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message