It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1595 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
1076 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
988 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
1018 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1196 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
1011 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
924 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
978 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
998 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
982 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
958 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
979 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1511 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
1015 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
972 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
954 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
974 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
896 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
989 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
938 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
999 Views

