It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1543 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
1032 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
945 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
967 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1154 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
961 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
875 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
929 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
951 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
933 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
910 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
923 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1447 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
972 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
940 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
909 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
925 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
854 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
939 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
889 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
960 Views

