Active Users:878 Time:09/08/2026 09:42:19 PM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1595 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1060 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1076 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 988 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1017 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1068 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1035 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 968 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 957 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1053 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1196 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1002 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1011 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 924 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 987 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 920 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 893 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 970 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1150 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1062 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 997 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 978 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 998 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 981 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 958 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1511 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1015 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 972 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 953 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 973 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 896 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1018 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1040 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 989 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 937 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 924 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 903 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 999 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1064 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1003 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 950 Views

Reply to Message