Active Users:603 Time:09/11/2026 11:57:42 PM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1684 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1138 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1130 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 1057 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1096 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1133 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1112 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 1025 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 1025 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1121 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1282 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1105 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1096 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 1009 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 1048 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 979 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 969 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 1035 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1225 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1146 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 1071 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 1046 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 1075 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 1048 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 1023 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 1068 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1632 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1086 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 1048 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 1033 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 1055 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 955 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1088 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1102 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 1075 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 1020 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 991 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 976 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1061 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1137 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1068 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 1025 Views

Reply to Message