Active Users:1712 Time:24/09/2026 09:04:11 AM
But is it...? Digital_Eon Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff.


Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1626 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1091 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1097 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 1012 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1044 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1088 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1062 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 986 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 980 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1079 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1231 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1033 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1040 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 957 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 1013 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 943 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 922 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 995 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1181 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1096 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 1023 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 1002 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 1032 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 1005 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 982 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 1009 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1547 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1037 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 997 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 982 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 1000 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 916 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1043 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1062 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 1017 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 969 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 953 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 930 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1021 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1092 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1033 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 975 Views

Reply to Message