Active Users:706 Time:24/06/2026 07:45:11 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1543 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1004 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1032 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 946 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 968 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1021 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 987 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 933 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 904 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1005 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1154 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 955 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 962 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 875 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 947 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 884 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 854 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 931 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1101 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1007 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 950 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 930 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 952 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 933 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 911 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1448 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 973 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 941 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 910 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 925 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 855 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 971 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 996 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 939 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 889 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 878 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 858 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 961 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1018 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 968 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 907 Views

Reply to Message