Active Users:704 Time:24/06/2026 07:45:12 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1543 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1004 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1032 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 946 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 968 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1021 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 987 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 933 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 904 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1005 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1154 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 955 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 962 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 876 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 947 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 884 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 854 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 931 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1101 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1007 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 950 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 930 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 952 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 933 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 911 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1448 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 973 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 941 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 910 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 925 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 855 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 971 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 996 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 939 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 889 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 878 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 858 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 961 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1018 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 968 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 907 Views

Reply to Message