Active Users:926 Time:31/01/2026 12:54:04 PM
Everything you said but this... CatherineSedai Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM
but I think it's possible that she might die if she takes the Oaths... she's about as old as Cadsuane.


I know this has been a hot point of debate and I'll admit I didn't slog through all of it so forgive me if someone has already argued this point with you.

I think when you take the oaths, they cut whatever remaining lifespan you would have had roughly in half. The WT Aes Sedai don't live much past 300, but one and all they swear the oaths very early in life. So their projected remaining life was approx 600 years, they get only 300. If Mesanna has lived about 300 years, and then took oaths, I think they would take her remaining 300-400 years and cut them in half.

She would not appear to age on the spot, or die, or appear ageless. (note: I think agelessness comes from time spent under the Oaths, not age + oaths) So Mesaana would appear exactly the same, but her projected lifespan would be only 150 or so more years. After 20 years she would look ageless just like an Aes Sedai. But none of that last bit would happen if she removed them quickly.

Point: by this reasoning, Siuan won't suddenly look like herself again when she retakes the oaths. She will gain the agelessness in about 20 more years, and since her clock was reset, she should live a bit longer than the other Aes Sedai.

I think this theory is supported by a similar RJ commentary:

RJ's blog 20 January 2006 "IT'S BEEN A WHILE"

- Regarding Sharina, and other women who learn to channel at age, she will indeed grow younger in appearance. No, she will not achieve an Aes Sedai face without the Oath Rod, but where she has previously looked, say, sixty, she will look perhaps thirty-five, with accompanying changes in hair color. Think of it as analogous to slowing, which older women also do.

So the power makes women age much more slowly. If cut from the power, you go back to being young. If granted the power in old age, you become young again. I don't think this evidence points to the three oaths aging someone on the spot.
I always say, if you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips. ~Birgitte
This message last edited by CatherineSedai on 21/07/2010 at 07:25:38 AM
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3940 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1130 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 1002 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1110 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1410 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 1061 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 1071 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1113 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 584 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 1075 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 1044 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 980 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 894 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 922 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1203 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 953 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 932 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 907 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 1064 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1134 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 986 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 978 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 919 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 980 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 1016 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 859 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1171 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 862 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 1022 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 943 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 1011 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 972 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 487 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 827 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 1018 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 936 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1111 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 876 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 932 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 1045 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 927 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1377 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 965 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 966 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 947 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1312 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 915 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 1000 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 848 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 845 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 837 Views

Reply to Message