Yeah I realize what I presented was kinda the opposite of what I was going for.
CatherineSedai Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 02:15:46 AM
In my defense it was very late at night
I like what came out of my blunder though, some good thoughts up there.
I like what came out of my blunder though, some good thoughts up there.Interview with Brandon
3. Question: She could swear that she’s not a Darkfriend on the Oath Rod, right?
3. Question: She could swear that she’s not a Darkfriend on the Oath Rod, right?
3. Answer: As long as she believed it to be true. Every remaining Aes Sedai in the Tower has retaken the three oaths. You should be thinking about ways to defeat the Oath Rod. There is a way to do it.
To me this is Brandon nudging our shoulder that the answer lies in Mesaana being able to defeat the oaths, and NOT a mind trick about her not really being a lowly Darkfriend.
I have read through theories from "she inverted gloves of air around her hands so her skin wasn't touching the rod" to "She could technically say she is Chosen and therefore not a DF".
My personal theory is this (influenced strongly but not entirely by Luckers over at Dragonmount):
Mesaana was masquerading as a "random" AS that she had already interrogated and killed. We know she was in contact with Sheriam in the rebel camp, so presumably it could have been Mesaana herself who warned the BA sisters in the tower. Saerin and the other Sitters had to take a census of Sisters and initiates the day after the battle, when Egwene was cleansing her Aes Sedai. Mesaana could have used the confusion of nobody knowing who was still within the tower to change disguises. All she has to do is select a new AS, imprison her in her own rooms tied up with inverted flows of air so nobody will sense her or disturb her. Fail to show up to the census as her old disguise (presumed dead or captured). Then, when Egwene is raised in the Tower, knowing that the second round of cleansing is about to begin, compel your prisoner and send her to reswear the oaths with orders to return to you when it's over.
I personally think this is one of the most plausible theories (quilted together from other ideas) especially since it doesn't involve any tricks of channeling or knowing how to block the binder. It's a simple "switcheroo".
To me this is Brandon nudging our shoulder that the answer lies in Mesaana being able to defeat the oaths, and NOT a mind trick about her not really being a lowly Darkfriend.
I have read through theories from "she inverted gloves of air around her hands so her skin wasn't touching the rod" to "She could technically say she is Chosen and therefore not a DF".
My personal theory is this (influenced strongly but not entirely by Luckers over at Dragonmount):
Mesaana was masquerading as a "random" AS that she had already interrogated and killed. We know she was in contact with Sheriam in the rebel camp, so presumably it could have been Mesaana herself who warned the BA sisters in the tower. Saerin and the other Sitters had to take a census of Sisters and initiates the day after the battle, when Egwene was cleansing her Aes Sedai. Mesaana could have used the confusion of nobody knowing who was still within the tower to change disguises. All she has to do is select a new AS, imprison her in her own rooms tied up with inverted flows of air so nobody will sense her or disturb her. Fail to show up to the census as her old disguise (presumed dead or captured). Then, when Egwene is raised in the Tower, knowing that the second round of cleansing is about to begin, compel your prisoner and send her to reswear the oaths with orders to return to you when it's over.
I personally think this is one of the most plausible theories (quilted together from other ideas) especially since it doesn't involve any tricks of channeling or knowing how to block the binder. It's a simple "switcheroo".
I always say, if you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips. ~Birgitte
This message last edited by CatherineSedai on 20/07/2010 at 02:17:52 AM
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod?
- 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM
4104 Views
That isn't tricking the oath rod, the way I'm understanding his answer. That's tricking humans *NM*
- 17/07/2010 10:29:52 AM
523 Views
I don't think
- 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM
1478 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod.
- 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM
1144 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod.
- 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM
1059 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't
- 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM
1272 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't
- 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM
1019 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't
- 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM
1000 Views
I think this is a tricky issue
- 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM
1132 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue
- 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM
1198 Views
Perhaps she pressed, and held the on/off switch, so that the Oaths never triggered? *NM*
- 19/07/2010 09:50:13 PM
494 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant.
- 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM
1083 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then....
- 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM
939 Views
What about the True Power?
- 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM
1098 Views
A true power invisible glove is better than a one power invisible glove. *NM*
- 20/07/2010 07:46:48 PM
523 Views
I doubt Mesaana stands high enough to have TP access right now. She's probably the lowest FS. *NM*
- 20/07/2010 07:55:31 PM
487 Views
Yeah I realize what I presented was kinda the opposite of what I was going for.
- 20/07/2010 02:15:46 AM
1014 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it.
- 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM
1091 Views
Wouldn't work
- 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM
997 Views
I agree, but...
- 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM
1120 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link
- 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM
999 Views
Re: Wouldn't work
- 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM
1381 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else
- 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM
974 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else
- 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM
1054 Views
Off-topic question:
- 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM
919 Views
I'm fairly certain that the ability can't be sensed until they are very close to touching
- 21/07/2010 09:29:54 PM
997 Views
