Active Users:644 Time:02/08/2025 11:06:08 PM
I agree, but... LoialT Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM

We don't know that's how the binder works. It's most likely it doesn't work like that. There's a binder for channelers and a binder for non-channelers and personally I think it has to do with physical differences, namely that channelers have different brains, or at least, their minds become altered when they're teenagers and exposed to the Source for the first time.

You don't even need to hold the Source to be bound... someone else can channel Spirit into the rod, so long as you touch it. A link would be just as useless, and even worse, the Sisters around would definitely notice. Mesaana would never trust her fate to the treacherous Black Ajah anyway... Liandrin was a murderous sneak at the best of times around Moghedien.


I don't think it is really about different brains as much as it is the same vulnerability that allows 1. The a'dam / The Domination Band; 2. Linking; 3. 13/13 Circle turning to the Dark. That is, I think the ability to channel allows one's spirit/mind to be opened to (and therefore vulnerable to) possession by outside spiritual forces (whether it is merging or domination produced by a direct link) or the possibility of being turned to the dark. This is not the same as rewiring the brain like in compulsion, which works equally well on channelers and non-channelers despite their "different brains." Rather, the Binders, a'dam, and 13/13 Circles all work around linking abilities. You also don't need to embrace the Source to be bound by an a'dam or controlled by a domination band and presumably the 13/13 circles wouldn't work if one only had to resist touching the Source to escape its powers. I also believe that the Warder bonds work more like a link and like the OR. This is another bond/binding that can be used to control others. Just look at Logain's control over the AS he bonded. It is absolute like the OR, not a matter of controlling consciousness like compulsion.
This message last edited by LoialT on 20/07/2010 at 08:20:55 PM
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3806 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1055 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 933 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1016 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1286 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 987 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 976 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1006 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 536 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 983 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 974 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 895 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 814 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 839 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1106 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 867 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 857 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 826 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 991 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1032 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 918 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 892 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 843 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 899 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 937 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 786 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1072 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 779 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 939 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 861 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 935 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 865 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 451 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 745 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 923 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 829 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1001 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 797 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 853 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 951 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 839 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1282 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 866 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 852 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 860 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1218 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 842 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 925 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 771 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 774 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 728 Views

Reply to Message