Active Users:428 Time:18/09/2025 09:32:55 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1333 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 817 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 850 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 755 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 752 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 831 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 792 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 751 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 725 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 788 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 943 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 752 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 757 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 690 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 768 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 689 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 659 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 737 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 886 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 818 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 748 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 735 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 748 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 712 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 697 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1203 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 789 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 729 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 708 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 723 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 687 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 792 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 770 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 724 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 703 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 705 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 675 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 758 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 805 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 792 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 721 Views

Reply to Message