Active Users:642 Time:22/03/2026 04:03:32 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1474 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 944 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 965 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 877 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 900 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 959 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 916 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 869 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 836 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 935 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1092 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 882 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 882 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 810 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 892 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 819 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 788 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 864 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1037 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 878 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 862 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 882 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 857 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 830 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1372 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 909 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 857 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 839 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 858 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 794 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 926 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 868 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 810 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 807 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 788 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 894 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 950 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 911 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message