Active Users:875 Time:09/08/2026 09:44:12 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1595 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1061 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1076 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 989 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1018 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1069 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1035 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 968 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 958 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1054 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1196 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1003 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1012 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 924 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 988 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 921 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 894 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 971 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1151 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1063 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 997 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 978 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 999 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 982 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 958 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1512 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1015 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 973 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 954 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 974 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 896 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1018 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1040 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 989 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 938 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 924 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 904 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 999 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1065 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1004 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 951 Views

Reply to Message