Active Users:605 Time:09/11/2026 11:57:50 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1684 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1139 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1130 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 1058 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1097 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1134 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1112 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 1025 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 1026 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1122 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1282 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1106 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1097 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 1009 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 1049 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 980 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 970 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 1036 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1226 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1146 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 1071 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 1046 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 1075 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 1048 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 1023 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 1068 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1633 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1086 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 1048 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 1034 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 1056 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 955 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1088 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1102 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 1075 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 1021 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 991 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 977 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1061 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1137 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1069 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 1026 Views

Reply to Message